rs144807538

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):​c.3192C>T​(p.Ile1064Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000885 in 1,614,018 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00076 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00090 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.366

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
MYH9 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • macrothrombocytopenia and granulocyte inclusions with or without nephritis or sensorineural hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • May-Hegglin anomaly
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).
BP6
Variant 22-36296923-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36296923-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 44557.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.366 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000761 (116/152338) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00122 (83/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00101. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 50 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 116 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH9NM_002473.6 linkc.3192C>T p.Ile1064Ile synonymous_variant Exon 25 of 41 ENST00000216181.11 NP_002464.1 P35579-1A0A024R1N1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH9ENST00000216181.11 linkc.3192C>T p.Ile1064Ile synonymous_variant Exon 25 of 41 1 NM_002473.6 ENSP00000216181.6 P35579-1
MYH9ENST00000685801.1 linkc.3255C>T p.Ile1085Ile synonymous_variant Exon 26 of 42 ENSP00000510688.1 A0A8I5KWT8
MYH9ENST00000459960.1 linkn.401C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 2 2
MYH9ENST00000691109.1 linkn.3487C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 19 of 35

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000769
AC:
117
AN:
152220
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0230
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000530
AC:
133
AN:
251128
AF XY:
0.000523
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000868
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000926
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000898
AC:
1313
AN:
1461680
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000824
AC XY:
599
AN XY:
727124
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000149
AC:
5
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000671
AC:
3
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000765
AC:
2
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000197
AC:
17
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000750
AC:
4
AN:
53300
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00112
AC:
1242
AN:
1111940
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000662
AC:
40
AN:
60388
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
81
161
242
322
403
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
46
92
138
184
230
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000761
AC:
116
AN:
152338
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000671
AC XY:
50
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000120
AC:
5
AN:
41582
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000261
AC:
4
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000414
AC:
2
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000942
AC:
1
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00122
AC:
83
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
7
14
21
28
35
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000822
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000895
EpiCase
AF:
0.00120
EpiControl
AF:
0.000771

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Jan 24, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 20, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 13, 2022
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MYH9: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

not specified Benign:3
Dec 14, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 20, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Ile1064Ile in Exon 25 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located with in the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 60/66148 European c hromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute .org; dbSNP rs144807538). -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

MYH9-related disorder Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
CADD
Benign
3.5
DANN
Benign
0.82
PhyloP100
-0.37
Mutation Taster
=84/16
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144807538; hg19: chr22-36692969; COSMIC: COSV53381550; COSMIC: COSV53381550; API