rs144848

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.1114A>C(p.Asn372His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.277 in 1,613,510 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 63,594 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.24 ( 4773 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.28 ( 58821 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:37O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.320

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005027443).

BP6

Variant 13-32332592-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32332592-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 9329.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32332592-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr13-32332592-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.344 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.1114A>C	p.Asn372His	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.1114A>C	p.Asn372His	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.745A>C	p.Asn249His	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.1114A>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 9 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.238

AC:

36156

AN:

151966

Hom.:

4768

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.125

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.295

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.304

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.360

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.258

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.356

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.221

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.261

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.276

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.261

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.280

AC:

69869

AN:

249852

Hom.:

10214

AF XY:

0.285

AC XY:

38560

AN XY:

135500

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.125

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.304

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.356

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.267

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.352

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.230

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.279

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.282

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.281

AC:

409992

AN:

1461426

Hom.:

58821

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.283

AC XY:

205796

AN XY:

726994

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.125

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.302

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.353

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.236

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.349

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.232

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.281

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.276

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.238

AC:

36183

AN:

152084

Hom.:

4773

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.239

AC XY:

17733

AN XY:

74322

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.125

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.304

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.360

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.258

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.358

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.221

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.276

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.267

Alfa

AF:

0.278

Hom.:

14900

Bravo

AF:

0.238

TwinsUK

AF:

0.282

AC:

1046

ALSPAC

AF:

0.284

AC:

1096

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.129

AC:

558

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.286

AC:

2449

ExAC

AF:

0.277

AC:

33603

Asia WGS

AF:

0.339

AC:

1177

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.278

EpiControl

AF:

0.281

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:37Other:1

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:1Benign:11

Nov 03, 2014

Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 21, 2015

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 02, 2014

Counsyl

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: literature only

High frequency in a 1kG or ESP population: 28.6 %. -

Feb 01, 2014

OMIM

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Oct 09, 2014

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

GreenArray Genomic Research & Solutions of Accurate Diagnostic Private Limited

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2015

Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.2552 (Asian), 0.09756 (African), 0.2876 (European), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). -

May 03, 2020

Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:8Other:1

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 23, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 18, 2017

Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 23, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Asn372His in exon 10 of BRCA2: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 35.58% (5867/16490) of South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitu te.org; dbSNP rs144848). -

Nov 01, 2017

GeneKor MSA

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:5

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32846166, 25348552, 21476145, 24289560, 32356124, 31477031, 29988080, 21990134, 24728327, 26306726, 27153395, 11062481, 19253839, 18288416, 22044372, 24323938, 23249957, 14555511, 15695382, 21702907, 17767707, 21952622, 20352487, 20135345, 22703879) -

Nov 27, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Nov 28, 2016

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2012

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:4

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2021

Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

Apr 19, 2022

National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 23, 2014

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Jan 17, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

May 07, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Nov 04, 2014

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast

Benign:2

Feb 01, 2025

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 23, 2017

Baylor Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast ductal adenocarcinoma

Uncertain:1

Jul 20, 2015

Next Generation Diagnostics, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Inc.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1

Benign:1

Apr 29, 2022

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

BRCA2-related cancer predisposition

Benign:1

Oct 02, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group D1

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Breast carcinoma

Benign:1

Apr 18, 2019

Center for Medical Genomics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.070

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.71

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.65

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.93

Eigen

Benign

-0.65

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.77

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.087

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0050

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.95

PrimateAI

Benign

0.25

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.60

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.041

Sift

Benign

0.14

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.34

T;T

Vest4

0.081

MPC

0.021

ClinPred

0.0012

GERP RS

0.40

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

gMVP

0.054

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over