rs144938364
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_018451.5(CPAP):c.2462C>T(p.Thr821Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000476 in 1,614,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018451.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- microcephaly 6 with or without short statureInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- microcephaly 6, primary, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- autosomal recessive primary microcephalyInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Seckel syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENPJ | ENST00000381884.9 | c.2462C>T | p.Thr821Met | missense_variant | Exon 7 of 17 | 1 | NM_018451.5 | ENSP00000371308.4 | ||
| CENPJ | ENST00000616936.4 | n.2462C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 7 of 16 | 1 | ENSP00000477511.1 | ||||
| CENPJ | ENST00000545981.6 | n.2462C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 7 of 18 | 2 | ENSP00000441090.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000703 AC: 107AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00148 AC: 372AN: 251412 AF XY: 0.00130 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000453 AC: 662AN: 1461872Hom.: 4 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000452 AC XY: 329AN XY: 727234 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000696 AC: 106AN: 152262Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000886 AC XY: 66AN XY: 74462 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Microcephaly 6, primary, autosomal recessive Pathogenic:1Uncertain:3
- -
- -
- -
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
not specified Benign:2
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
not provided Benign:2
- -
CPAP: BP4, BS1 -
Seckel syndrome 4 Uncertain:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
CENPJ-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Seckel syndrome 1 Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at