rs145022945

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000057.4(BLM):c.3041A>G(p.His1014Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000281 in 1,604,568 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00031 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00028 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

BLM
NM_000057.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.69

Variant links:

Genes affected

BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BLM links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008082211).

BP6

Variant 15-90794188-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-90794188-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 236810.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=3}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BLM	NM_000057.4 link	c.3041A>G	p.His1014Arg	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 22	ENST00000355112.8	NP_000048.1	P54132

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BLM	ENST00000355112.8 link	c.3041A>G	p.His1014Arg	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 22	1	NM_000057.4	ENSP00000347232.3		P54132

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000309

AC:

AN:

152192

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0112

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000470

AC:

117

AN:

248978

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000483

AC XY:

AN XY:

134598

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00955

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000463

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000124

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000990

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000278

AC:

404

AN:

1452376

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000307

AC XY:

222

AN XY:

722648

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000300

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000226

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0112

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000188

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000561

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000784

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000309

AC:

AN:

152192

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000336

AC XY:

AN XY:

74362

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.0112

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000595

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000295

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000466

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000346

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Bloom syndrome

Uncertain:2Benign:2

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Aug 05, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 02, 2018

Mendelics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Sep 11, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jun 03, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Aug 01, 2018

GeneKor MSA

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Dec 19, 2022

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 04, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign in association with a neurodevelopmental phenotype to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23129629, 31159747, 28805986) -

not specified

Benign:2

Jun 19, 2018

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 14, 2021

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: BLM c.3041A>G (p.His1014Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Helicase, C-terminal domain (IPR001650) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00043 in 280338 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0097 within the Ashkenazi Jewish subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Ashkenazi Jewish control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 3 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BLM causing Bloom Syndrome phenotype (0.0035), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Ashkenazi Jewish origin. c.3041A>G has been reported in the literature in one individual who had genetic testing with a hereditary cancer panel (Tsaousis_2019). The report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Bloom Syndrome. At least one functional study reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function and showed no damaging effect of this variant (Mirzaei_2012). Seven ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance (n=3), likely benign (n=3) and benign (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

BLM-related disorder

Benign:1

Mar 20, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.15

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

0.011

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.010

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.32

T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.034

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.20

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

1.0

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.86

D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.020

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0081

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.80

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.9

L;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.61

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.9

D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.41

Sift

Uncertain

0.0080

D;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.077

T;T

Polyphen

0.011

B;.

Vest4

0.45

MVP

0.86

MPC

0.42

ClinPred

0.12

GERP RS

5.5

Varity_R

0.62

gMVP

0.66

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over