rs145027663
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_000057.4(BLM):āc.3397A>Gā(p.Lys1133Glu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000211 in 1,613,800 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K1133N) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000057.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | NM_000057.4 | c.3397A>G | p.Lys1133Glu | missense_variant | 18/22 | ENST00000355112.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | ENST00000355112.8 | c.3397A>G | p.Lys1133Glu | missense_variant | 18/22 | 1 | NM_000057.4 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000279 AC: 7AN: 251272Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135798
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000753 AC: 11AN: 1461626Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727068
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74340
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 16, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Feb 18, 2022 | - - |
BLM-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 21, 2024 | The BLM c.3397A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Lys1133Glu. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in association with disorders in the literature. Functional studies showed that this variant does not significantly affect protein function in response to DNA-damaging agents (Table 1, Mirzaei et al. 2012. PubMed ID: 23129629). This variant is reported in 0.048% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD and has conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity in ClinVar ranging from likely benign to uncertain (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/127498). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Bloom syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 10, 2024 | This sequence change replaces lysine, which is basic and polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 1133 of the BLM protein (p.Lys1133Glu). This variant is present in population databases (rs145027663, gnomAD 0.04%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BLM-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 127498). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BLM protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect BLM function (PMID: 23129629). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 25, 2014 | Single pathogenic variants in BLM have only recently been described in association with cancer predisposition and the risks are not well understood. This variant is denoted BLM c.3397A>G at the cDNA level, p.Lys1133Glu (K1133E) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Lysine to a Glutamic Acid (AAA>GAA). This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as pathogenic or benign. BLM Lys1133Glu was observed with an allele frequency of 0.1% (5/4396) in African Americans in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, not frequent enough to be considered a polymorphism. Since Lysine and Glutamic Acid differ in polarity, charge, size or other properties, this is considered a non-conservative amino acid substitution and is likely to affect protein integrity. BLM Lys1133Glu occurs at a position that is moderately conserved across species and is not located in a known functional domain. In silico analyses are inconsistent regarding the effect this variant may have on protein structure and function. At a molecular level, the impact of this missense variant on protein structure and function is not known and thus we consider this to be a variant of uncertain significance. Furthermore, based on the currently available information, cancer risks associated with this variant, and with single variants the BLM gene in general, remain unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at