rs145215218

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_000165.5(GJA1):​c.1128G>A​(p.Arg376Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000839 in 1,613,208 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00047 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00088 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

GJA1
NM_000165.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.08

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GJA1 (HGNC:4274): (gap junction protein alpha 1) This gene is a member of the connexin gene family. The encoded protein is a component of gap junctions, which are composed of arrays of intercellular channels that provide a route for the diffusion of low molecular weight materials from cell to cell. The encoded protein is the major protein of gap junctions in the heart that are thought to have a crucial role in the synchronized contraction of the heart and in embryonic development. A related intronless pseudogene has been mapped to chromosome 5. Mutations in this gene have been associated with oculodentodigital dysplasia, autosomal recessive craniometaphyseal dysplasia and heart malformations. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]
GJA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hypoplastic left heart syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • oculodentodigital dysplasia
    Inheritance: AD, SD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • autosomal dominant palmoplantar keratoderma and congenital alopecia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • erythrokeratodermia variabilis et progressiva 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • oculodentodigital dysplasia, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • craniometaphyseal dysplasia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • erythrokeratodermia variabilis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • syndactyly type 3
    Inheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Hallermann-Streiff syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P
  • craniometaphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 6-121447975-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-121447975-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 355163.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.08 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000475 (72/151586) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000838 (57/67980). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000664. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 34 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 Unknown,AD,AR,SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GJA1NM_000165.5 linkc.1128G>A p.Arg376Arg synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 2 ENST00000282561.4 NP_000156.1 P17302A0A654IBU3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GJA1ENST00000282561.4 linkc.1128G>A p.Arg376Arg synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 2 1 NM_000165.5 ENSP00000282561.3 P17302
GJA1ENST00000647564.1 linkc.1128G>A p.Arg376Arg synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 2 ENSP00000497565.1 P17302
GJA1ENST00000649003.1 linkc.1128G>A p.Arg376Arg synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 2 ENSP00000497283.1 P17302
GJA1ENST00000650427.1 linkc.1128G>A p.Arg376Arg synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 2 ENSP00000497367.1 P17302

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000482
AC:
73
AN:
151468
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000242
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000407
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000838
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000425
AC:
106
AN:
249332
AF XY:
0.000429
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000347
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000798
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000330
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000876
AC:
1281
AN:
1461622
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000849
AC XY:
617
AN XY:
727122
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000120
AC:
4
AN:
33470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000537
AC:
24
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00110
AC:
1219
AN:
1111800
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000563
AC:
34
AN:
60378
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.471
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
69
139
208
278
347
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
48
96
144
192
240
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000475
AC:
72
AN:
151586
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000459
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
74024
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000217
AC:
9
AN:
41510
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000406
AC:
6
AN:
14770
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5146
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10586
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000838
AC:
57
AN:
67980
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2100
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.479
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5
10
14
19
24
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000647
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000631
EpiCase
AF:
0.000818
EpiControl
AF:
0.000711

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hypoplastic left heart syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Oculodentodigital dysplasia Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Syndactyly type 3 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
Aug 28, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oculodentodigital dysplasia, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Dec 17, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
7.6
DANN
Benign
0.52
PhyloP100
2.1
Mutation Taster
=91/9
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145215218; hg19: chr6-121769121; API