rs145271283
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The ENST00000389048.8(ALK):c.2526C>T(p.Ala842=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000382 in 1,614,270 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A842A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000389048.8 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALK | NM_004304.5 | c.2526C>T | p.Ala842= | synonymous_variant | 15/29 | ENST00000389048.8 | NP_004295.2 | |
ALK | XR_001738688.3 | n.3453C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 15/18 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALK | ENST00000389048.8 | c.2526C>T | p.Ala842= | synonymous_variant | 15/29 | 1 | NM_004304.5 | ENSP00000373700 | P1 | |
ALK | ENST00000618119.4 | c.1395C>T | p.Ala465= | synonymous_variant | 14/28 | 5 | ENSP00000482733 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000322 AC: 49AN: 152262Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000704 AC: 177AN: 251468Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.000831 AC XY: 113AN XY: 135912
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000388 AC: 567AN: 1461890Hom.: 2 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000463 AC XY: 337AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000322 AC: 49AN: 152380Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000309 AC XY: 23AN XY: 74516
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2024 | ALK: BP4, BP7 - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 10, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 16, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at