rs145278250
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2_Supporting
The NM_206933.4(USH2A):c.9915G>C(p.Glu3305Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000351 in 1,614,076 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E3305A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_206933.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Usher syndrome type 2AInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Usher syndrome type 2Inheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- retinitis pigmentosa 39Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- retinitis pigmentosaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_206933.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000427 AC: 65AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00115 AC: 288AN: 251264 AF XY: 0.00106 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000343 AC: 501AN: 1461756Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000340 AC XY: 247AN XY: 727174 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000427 AC: 65AN: 152320Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000470 AC XY: 35AN XY: 74470 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at