rs145292219
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.1385G>A(p.Gly462Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00361 in 1,612,888 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0033 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0036 ( 20 hom. )
Consequence
MYO15A
NM_016239.4 missense
NM_016239.4 missense
Scores
4
15
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.95
Genes affected
MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0044930875).
BP6
Variant 17-18120185-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18120185-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 226777.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-18120185-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00326 (496/152350) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00608 (93/15306). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00508. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 260 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00326 AC: 497AN: 152232Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
497
AN:
152232
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00359 AC: 890AN: 248076Hom.: 7 AF XY: 0.00363 AC XY: 490AN XY: 134990
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
890
AN:
248076
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
490
AN XY:
134990
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00364 AC: 5320AN: 1460538Hom.: 20 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00368 AC XY: 2673AN XY: 726562
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5320
AN:
1460538
Hom.:
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
AC XY:
2673
AN XY:
726562
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00326 AC: 496AN: 152350Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00349 AC XY: 260AN XY: 74500
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
496
AN:
152350
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
260
AN XY:
74500
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
6
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
15
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
40
ExAC
AF:
AC:
424
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 20, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24498627) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2023 | MYO15A: BS2 - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 30, 2012 | Gly462Asp in Exon 02 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 0.5% (32/6856) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http ://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs145292219). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 25, 2016 | - - |
MYO15A-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 19, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;.;T
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
.;L;L
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
.;N;.
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
.;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;.
Polyphen
0.11
.;B;B
Vest4
MVP
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at