rs145324823

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_002691.4(POLD1):​c.378C>T​(p.Arg126Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00197 in 1,613,886 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

POLD1
NM_002691.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: -7.01

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLD1 (HGNC:9175): (DNA polymerase delta 1, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the 125-kDa catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta. DNA polymerase delta possesses both polymerase and 3' to 5' exonuclease activity and plays a critical role in DNA replication and repair. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed for this gene, and a pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
POLD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • POLD1-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
  • mandibular hypoplasia-deafness-progeroid syndrome
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, G2P
  • Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • immunodeficiency 120
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • non-severe combined immunodeficiency due to polymerase delta deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).
BP6
Variant 19-50401839-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50401839-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 221130.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-7.01 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
POLD1NM_002691.4 linkc.378C>T p.Arg126Arg synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 27 ENST00000440232.7 NP_002682.2 P28340A0A024R4F4Q59FA0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
POLD1ENST00000440232.7 linkc.378C>T p.Arg126Arg synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 27 1 NM_002691.4 ENSP00000406046.1 P28340

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00178
AC:
271
AN:
152134
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000290
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00242
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00697
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00207
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00173
AC:
434
AN:
250914
AF XY:
0.00177
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000308
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00191
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00491
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00214
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00196
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00199
AC:
2907
AN:
1461636
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.00195
AC XY:
1416
AN XY:
727146
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000358
AC:
12
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00183
AC:
82
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26120
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000348
AC:
3
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00507
AC:
270
AN:
53304
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000347
AC:
2
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00214
AC:
2383
AN:
1111914
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00255
AC:
154
AN:
60382
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
175
350
525
700
875
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
88
176
264
352
440
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00178
AC:
271
AN:
152250
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00211
AC XY:
157
AN XY:
74444
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000289
AC:
12
AN:
41552
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00242
AC:
37
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00697
AC:
74
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00207
AC:
141
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00284
AC:
6
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14
29
43
58
72
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00137
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00144
EpiCase
AF:
0.00185
EpiControl
AF:
0.00190

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 02, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 23, 2018
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: POLD1 c.378C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0017 in 276646 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 119 fold above the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in POLD1 causing Colorectal Cancer phenotype (1.4e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Jul 26, 2016
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 06, 2017
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:5
Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

POLD1: BP4, BP7 -

Nov 29, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 02, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Jul 16, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

May 07, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Jan 20, 2025
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The synonymous variant NM_001308632.1(POLD1):c.378C>T (p.Arg126=) has been reported to ClinVar as Benign/Likely benign with a status of (2 stars) criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts (Variation ID 221130 as of 2025-01-02). The p.Arg126= variant is observed in 7/5,008 (0.1398%) alleles from individuals of 1kG All background in 1kG, which is greater than expected for the disorder. The p.Arg126= variant is not predicted to disrupt an existing splice site. The p.Arg126= variant results in a substitution of a base that is not predicted conserved by GERP++ and PhyloP. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Benign -

Feb 14, 2018
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10 Benign:2
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The POLD1 p.Arg126= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs145324823) as "With other allele" and ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae and one other clinical laboratory; and as likely benign by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, and two other clinical laboratories). The variant was identified in control databases in 468 of 276646 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.002, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 5 of 23978 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Other in 12 of 6456 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Latino in 69 of 34412 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), European in 252 of 126308 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Finnish in 128 of 25720 chromosomes (freq: 0.005), and South Asian in 2 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish or East Asian populations. The p.Arg126= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.75
CADD
Benign
0.062
DANN
Benign
0.88
PhyloP100
-7.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145324823; hg19: chr19-50905096; API