rs145425340

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_147127.5(EVC2):c.2897C>T(p.Ser966Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000954 in 1,614,146 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S966S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000057 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

EVC2
NM_147127.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.374

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

EVC2 (HGNC:19747): (EvC ciliary complex subunit 2) This gene encodes a protein that functions in bone formation and skeletal development. Mutations in this gene, as well as in a neighboring gene that lies in a head-to-head configuration, cause Ellis-van Creveld syndrome, an autosomal recessive skeletal dysplasia that is also known as chondroectodermal dysplasia. Mutations in this gene also cause acrofacial dysostosis Weyers type, also referred to as Curry-Hall syndrome, a disease that combines limb and facial abnormalities. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

EVC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

acrofacial dysostosis, Weyers type
Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
Ellis-van Creveld syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine

EVC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.044836223).

BP6

Variant 4-5584783-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-5584783-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 426920.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
EVC2	NM_147127.5 link	c.2897C>T	p.Ser966Leu	missense_variant	Exon 17 of 22	ENST00000344408.10	NP_667338.3	Q86UK5-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
EVC2	ENST00000344408.10 link	c.2897C>T	p.Ser966Leu	missense_variant	Exon 17 of 22	1	NM_147127.5	ENSP00000342144.5		Q86UK5-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000460

AC:

AN:

152140

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00152

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000139

AC:

AN:

251468

AF XY:

0.000103

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00166

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000173

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000575

AC:

AN:

1461888

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000399

AC XY:

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00197

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000134

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000348

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53418

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000360

AC:

AN:

1112012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000662

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.476

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000460

AC:

AN:

152258

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000484

AC XY:

AN XY:

74448

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00152

AC:

AN:

41556

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000261

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5158

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68010

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.509

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000129

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000582

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000681

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000214

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Ellis-van Creveld syndrome;C0457013:Curry-Hall syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Oct 31, 2018

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 06, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Mar 28, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The S966L variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. The S966L variant was observed in 19/10400 (0.18%) alleles in the ExAC dataset (Lek et al., 2016). The S966L variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is not conserved. In silico analysis predicts this variant likely does not alter the protein structure/function. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.33

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.27

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.069

T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.60

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.71

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.12

LIST_S2

Benign

0.85

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.019

MetaRNN

Benign

0.045

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.88

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.5

M;.

PhyloP100

0.37

PrimateAI

Benign

0.47

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.5

N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.30

Sift

Benign

0.090

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.15

T;T

Polyphen

0.99

D;.

Vest4

0.61

MVP

0.82

MPC

0.027

ClinPred

0.026

GERP RS

1.3

Varity_R

0.041

gMVP

0.18

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.050

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over