rs145425799

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2_Supporting

The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.849C>T(p.Thr283Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000192 in 1,611,878 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T283T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000092 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -8.59

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

WT1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Denys-Drash syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P
Wilms tumor 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Frasier syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

WT1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).

BP6

Variant 11-32427994-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32427994-G-A is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 414082.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-8.59 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 14 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
WT1	NM_024426.6 link	c.849C>T	p.Thr283Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 10	ENST00000452863.10	NP_077744.4	P19544-7Q6PI38

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
WT1	ENST00000452863.10 link	c.849C>T	p.Thr283Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 10	1	NM_024426.6	ENSP00000415516.5		P19544-7A0A0A0MT54

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000920

AC:

AN:

152220

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000338

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000245

AC:

AN:

244808

AF XY:

0.0000150

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000258

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000183

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

1459540

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000152

AC XY:

AN XY:

725902

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000269

AC:

AN:

33452

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44660

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26090

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39664

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86028

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52924

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5410

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000450

AC:

AN:

1111088

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000332

AC:

AN:

60224

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.469

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000919

AC:

AN:

152338

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000671

AC XY:

AN XY:

74486

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000337

AC:

AN:

41594

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15310

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5158

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10628

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.482

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000761

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000106

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1

Benign:1

Nov 16, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Aug 21, 2024

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0344542:Aniridia 1;C0345967:Mesothelioma, malignant;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;C1837026:Meacham syndrome;C3151568:Nephrotic syndrome, type 4;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1

Benign:1

Dec 23, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.72

CADD

Benign

0.10

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.92

PhyloP100

-8.6

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over