rs145448362

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_173477.5(USH1G):​c.83C>T​(p.Pro28Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000998 in 1,566,474 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00060 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

USH1G
NM_173477.5 missense

Scores

2
7
7

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.99
Variant links:
Genes affected
USH1G (HGNC:16356): (USH1 protein network component sans) This gene encodes a protein that contains three ankyrin domains, a class I PDZ-binding motif and a sterile alpha motif. The encoded protein interacts with harmonin, which is associated with Usher syndrome type 1C. This protein plays a role in the development and maintenance of the auditory and visual systems and functions in the cohesion of hair bundles formed by inner ear sensory cells. Mutations in this gene are associated with Usher syndrome type 1G (USH1G). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
OTOP2 (HGNC:19657): (otopetrin 2) Predicted to enable proton channel activity. Predicted to be involved in proton transmembrane transport. Predicted to be located in plasma membrane. Predicted to be integral component of membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.081706524).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000605 (92/152186) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00126 (86/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00105. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 40 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
USH1GNM_173477.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.83C>T p.Pro28Leu missense_variant 1/3 ENST00000614341.5 NP_775748.2
USH1GNM_001282489.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.-174C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/3 NP_001269418.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
USH1GENST00000614341.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.83C>T p.Pro28Leu missense_variant 1/31 NM_173477.5 ENSP00000480279 P1
OTOP2ENST00000580223.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-274G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/51 ENSP00000463837
USH1GENST00000579243.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.83C>T p.Pro28Leu missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 1/32 ENSP00000462568

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000605
AC:
92
AN:
152186
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000965
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00126
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000757
AC:
138
AN:
182298
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000758
AC XY:
74
AN XY:
97570
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000364
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00161
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00104
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00104
AC:
1472
AN:
1414288
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00107
AC XY:
747
AN XY:
698568
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000926
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000260
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000200
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000753
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000605
AC:
92
AN:
152186
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000538
AC XY:
40
AN XY:
74334
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000965
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00126
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00141
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000699
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00163
AC:
14
ExAC
AF:
0.000419
AC:
50
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:4Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpOct 17, 2022This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 28 of the USH1G protein (p.Pro28Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs145448362, gnomAD 0.1%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with Usher syndrome or retinitis pigmentosa (PMID: 17896313, 22135276, 28224992). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 48139). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt USH1G protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsJan 25, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 12, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17896313, 28224992) -
Usher syndrome type 1G Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJul 30, 2021The USH1G c.83C>T; p.Pro28Leu variant (rs145448362) is reported in the literature in several individuals affected with Usher syndrome or retinitis pigmentosa, although a second variant was not reported in any individuals (Aller 2007, Haer-Wigman 2017, Le Quesne Stabej 2012). This variant is found in the non-Finnish European population with an overall allele frequency of 0.15% (138/91578 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The proline at codon 28 is highly conserved, and computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.353). Due to limited information, the clinical significance of the p.Pro28Leu variant is uncertain at this time. References: Aller et al. Screening of the USH1G gene among Spanish patients with Usher syndrome. Lack of mutations and evidence of a minor role in the pathogenesis of the syndrome. Ophthalmic Genet. 2007 Sep;28(3):151-5. PMID: 17896313. Haer-Wigman et al. Diagnostic exome sequencing in 266 Dutch patients with visual impairment. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 May;25(5):591-599. PMID: 28224992. Le Quesne Stabej et al. Comprehensive sequence analysis of nine Usher syndrome genes in the UK National Collaborative Usher Study. J Med Genet. 2012 Jan;49(1):27-36. PMID: 22135276. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 07, 2020Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Pro28Leu variant in USH1G has been reported in the heterozygous state in two individuals with Usher syndrome type 2 (Aller 2007), one individual with retinitis pigmentosa (Haer-Wigman, 2017), and three children with apparently nonsyndromic hearing loss (LMM data). It has also been identified in 0.15% (138/91578) of Europeans chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) and has been reported as likely benign by a clinical lab in ClinVar (Variation ID 48139). Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, while the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain, its frequency suggests that it is more likely to be benign. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS1_Supporting. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.50
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
0.0025
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.21
CADD
Pathogenic
28
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.14
T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.46
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.49
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.040
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.082
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.2
M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.84
D
Sift4G
Benign
0.19
T
Polyphen
0.76
P
Vest4
0.59
MVP
0.50
ClinPred
0.14
T
GERP RS
4.1
Varity_R
0.30
gMVP
0.65

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145448362; hg19: chr17-72919086; API