rs145478892
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_001082538.3(TCTN1):c.298G>A(p.Val100Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000149 in 1,614,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001082538.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCTN1 | NM_001082538.3 | c.298G>A | p.Val100Met | missense_variant | 2/15 | ENST00000397659.9 | NP_001076007.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCTN1 | ENST00000397659.9 | c.298G>A | p.Val100Met | missense_variant | 2/15 | 1 | NM_001082538.3 | ENSP00000380779 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000671 AC: 102AN: 152072Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000168 AC: 42AN: 249582Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000133 AC XY: 18AN XY: 135410
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000937 AC: 137AN: 1461880Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000688 AC XY: 50AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000677 AC: 103AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000753 AC XY: 56AN XY: 74406
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 18, 2019 | In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function - |
Joubert syndrome 13 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 14, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 23, 2023 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at