rs145517108

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):c.1566G>A(p.Pro522Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000142 in 1,614,014 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00056 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000099 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.838

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]

MYH9 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
macrothrombocytopenia and granulocyte inclusions with or without nephritis or sensorineural hearing loss
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
May-Hegglin anomaly
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

MYH9 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).

BP6

Variant 22-36312211-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36312211-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 287602.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.838 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000558 (85/152222) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00176 (73/41540). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00143. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 38 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 85 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002473.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	MYH9	NM_002473.6	MANE Select	c.1566G>A	p.Pro522Pro	synonymous	Exon 14 of 41	NP_002464.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
MYH9	ENST00000216181.11	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.1566G>A	p.Pro522Pro	synonymous	Exon 14 of 41	ENSP00000216181.6
MYH9	ENST00000685801.1		c.1566G>A	p.Pro522Pro	synonymous	Exon 14 of 42	ENSP00000510688.1
MYH9	ENST00000685187.1		n.1780G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 14 of 14

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000552

AC:

AN:

152104

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00174

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000524

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000203

AC:

AN:

250976

AF XY:

0.000155

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00179

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000202

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000985

AC:

144

AN:

1461792

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000908

AC XY:

AN XY:

727204

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00164

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000179

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000101

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53336

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000867

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000540

AC:

AN:

1112004

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000199

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.481

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000558

AC:

AN:

152222

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000510

AC XY:

AN XY:

74438

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00176

AC:

AN:

41540

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000523

AC:

AN:

15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000193

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4814

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

67996

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2104

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.508

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000415

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000725

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Jan 27, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 29, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 07, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified

Benign:2

Aug 02, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Pro522Pro in exon 14 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.1% (12/10304) of A frican chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadi nstitute.org; dbSNP rs145517108).

Sep 13, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

MYH9-related disorder

Benign:1

Mar 13, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.73

CADD

Benign

6.5

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.86

PhyloP100

-0.84

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.8

Mutation Taster

=95/5

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.040

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over