Menu
GeneBe

rs145560678

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_024422.6(DSC2):c.907G>A(p.Val303Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000631 in 1,614,094 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00049 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00065 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

DSC2
NM_024422.6 missense

Scores

6
12

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.758
Variant links:
Genes affected
DSC2 (HGNC:3036): (desmocollin 2) This gene encodes a member of the desmocollin protein subfamily. Desmocollins, along with desmogleins, are cadherin-like transmembrane glycoproteins that are major components of the desmosome. Desmosomes are cell-cell junctions that help resist shearing forces and are found in high concentrations in cells subject to mechanical stress. This gene is found in a cluster with other desmocollin family members on chromosome 18. Mutations in this gene are associated with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia-11, and reduced protein expression has been described in several types of cancer. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011647344).
BP6
Variant 18-31086611-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-31086611-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 46202.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr18-31086611-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr18-31086611-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000486 (74/152234) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00787 (38/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00589. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 46 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DSC2NM_024422.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.907G>A p.Val303Met missense_variant 7/16 ENST00000280904.11
DSC2NM_004949.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.907G>A p.Val303Met missense_variant 7/17
DSC2NM_001406506.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.478G>A p.Val160Met missense_variant 7/16
DSC2NM_001406507.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.478G>A p.Val160Met missense_variant 7/17

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DSC2ENST00000280904.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.907G>A p.Val303Met missense_variant 7/161 NM_024422.6 P1Q02487-1
DSC2ENST00000251081.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.907G>A p.Val303Met missense_variant 7/171 Q02487-2
DSC2ENST00000648081.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.478G>A p.Val160Met missense_variant 8/17
DSC2ENST00000682357.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.478G>A p.Val160Met missense_variant 7/16

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000493
AC:
75
AN:
152116
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00807
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000382
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00108
AC:
271
AN:
251432
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00139
AC XY:
189
AN XY:
135886
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000198
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00679
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000422
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000646
AC:
944
AN:
1461860
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000846
AC XY:
615
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000894
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000151
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00653
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000253
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000894
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000486
AC:
74
AN:
152234
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000618
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
74416
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00787
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000382
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000474
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000283
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000233
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.00119
AC:
145
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00289
AC:
10
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000491
EpiControl
AF:
0.000533

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 11 Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtJul 31, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAl Jalila Children's Genomics Center, Al Jalila Childrens Speciality HospitalJan 08, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 22, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
not specified Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineNov 15, 2016p.Val303Met in exon 7 of DSC2: This variant has been identified in 0.7% (120/165 12) of South Asian chromosomes, including 1 homozygote, by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs145560678). This vari ant was previously reported in 1 individual with DCM (Garcia-Pavia 2011). Howeve r, given the high frequency of this variant in the general population, it is not expected to have clinical significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpNov 02, 2020Variant summary: DSC2 c.907G>A (p.Val303Met) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Cadherin-like domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0011 in 252686 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0068 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 680-fold the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in DSC2 causing Arrhythmia phenotype (1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. c.907G>A has been reported in the literature in at least one individual affected with cardiomyopathy (e.g. Garcia-Pavia_2011), but also in healthy controls (e.g. Kapplinger_2011). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Arrhythmia. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Nine other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. They have cited the variant as benign/likely benign (n=8) and uncertain significance (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 03, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJan 01, 2024DSC2: BP4 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 09, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMar 20, 2018- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 12, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.43
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
Cadd
Benign
23
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.11
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
0.18
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.089
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.15
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.81
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.6
M;M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.86
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.44
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
D;D;.
REVEL
Benign
0.20
Sift
Uncertain
0.014
D;D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.035
D;D;.
Polyphen
0.99
D;D;.
Vest4
0.33
MVP
0.58
MPC
0.27
ClinPred
0.067
T
GERP RS
3.8
Varity_R
0.25
gMVP
0.47

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145560678; hg19: chr18-28666574; COSMIC: COSV51862738; API