rs145564837
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 1P and 14B. PP3BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1
The NM_004999.4(MYO6):c.1025C>T(p.Ala342Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0015 in 1,613,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
MYO6
NM_004999.4 missense
NM_004999.4 missense
Scores
10
5
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.54
Genes affected
MYO6 (HGNC:7605): (myosin VI) This gene encodes a reverse-direction motor protein that moves toward the minus end of actin filaments and plays a role in intracellular vesicle and organelle transport. The protein consists of a motor domain containing an ATP- and an actin-binding site and a globular tail which interacts with other proteins. This protein maintains the structural integrity of inner ear hair cells and mutations in this gene cause non-syndromic autosomal dominant and recessive hearing loss. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
PP3
?
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 8: BayesDel_noAF, Dann, Eigen, M_CAP, MutationAssessor, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PrimateAI, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.25080067).
BP6
?
Variant 6-75848478-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-75848478-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 45131.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr6-75848478-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00122 (185/152242) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00226 (154/68010). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00197. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 88 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO6 | NM_004999.4 | c.1025C>T | p.Ala342Val | missense_variant | 11/35 | ENST00000369977.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO6 | ENST00000369977.8 | c.1025C>T | p.Ala342Val | missense_variant | 11/35 | 1 | NM_004999.4 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00122 AC: 185AN: 152124Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
185
AN:
152124
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00133 AC: 334AN: 251308Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00137 AC XY: 186AN XY: 135814
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
334
AN:
251308
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
186
AN XY:
135814
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00153 AC: 2231AN: 1461642Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00146 AC XY: 1065AN XY: 727122
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2231
AN:
1461642
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1065
AN XY:
727122
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00122 AC: 185AN: 152242Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00118 AC XY: 88AN XY: 74442
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
185
AN:
152242
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
88
AN XY:
74442
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
5
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
19
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
193
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:11
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:7
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Dec 01, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 30, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 04, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27068579) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 21, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2023 | MYO6: PP3, BS1, BS2 - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 37 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Dec 21, 2017 | p.Ala342Val in exon 11 of MYO6: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 0.24% (304/126610) of Non-Finnish E uropean chromosomes and 0.16% (42/25786) of Finnish chromosomes including 1 homo zygote by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute. org; dbSNP rs145564837). It has been previously reported by our laboratory in th e heterozygous state in 6 individuals with hearing loss, including 2 with differ ent alternate etiologies. ACMG/AMP criteria applied: BS1_supporting, BP5. - |
Nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Hearing Loss Variant Curation Expert Panel | Mar 25, 2019 | The filtering allele frequency of the p.Ala342Val variant in the MYO6 gene is 0.21% for European (non-Finnish) chromosomes by gnomAD (304/129090 with 95% CI), and one homozygous European (Finnish) individual, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal dominant hearing loss variants (BA1). The REVEL computational prediction analysis tool produced a score of 0.905, however, this information is not predictive of pathogenicity on its own and is not considered in conflict with evidence that supports a benign interpretation. In summary, the HL EP classified this variant as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the Hearing Loss Expert Panel: BA1. - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 22 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
MYO6-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 29, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
Cadd
Uncertain
Dann
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
D;.;.;.;D;D
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;.;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
D
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D;D;.;D;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D;.;D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0, 0.95
.;D;P;D;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.26
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at