Menu
GeneBe

rs145564837

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 1P and 14B. PP3BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1

The NM_004999.4(MYO6):c.1025C>T(p.Ala342Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0015 in 1,613,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

MYO6
NM_004999.4 missense

Scores

10
5
2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.54
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO6 (HGNC:7605): (myosin VI) This gene encodes a reverse-direction motor protein that moves toward the minus end of actin filaments and plays a role in intracellular vesicle and organelle transport. The protein consists of a motor domain containing an ATP- and an actin-binding site and a globular tail which interacts with other proteins. This protein maintains the structural integrity of inner ear hair cells and mutations in this gene cause non-syndromic autosomal dominant and recessive hearing loss. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 8: BayesDel_noAF, Dann, Eigen, M_CAP, MutationAssessor, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PrimateAI, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.25080067).
BP6
Variant 6-75848478-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-75848478-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 45131.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr6-75848478-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00122 (185/152242) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00226 (154/68010). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00197. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 88 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYO6NM_004999.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1025C>T p.Ala342Val missense_variant 11/35 ENST00000369977.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYO6ENST00000369977.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1025C>T p.Ala342Val missense_variant 11/351 NM_004999.4 A1Q9UM54-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00122
AC:
185
AN:
152124
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000290
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000755
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00133
AC:
334
AN:
251308
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00137
AC XY:
186
AN XY:
135814
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000308
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00239
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00196
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00153
AC:
2231
AN:
1461642
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00146
AC XY:
1065
AN XY:
727122
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000269
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000201
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00131
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00122
AC:
185
AN:
152242
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00118
AC XY:
88
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000755
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.00186
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00111
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00130
AC:
5
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00221
AC:
19
ExAC
AF:
0.00159
AC:
193
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00169
EpiControl
AF:
0.00119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:11
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:7
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 01, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jan 30, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 04, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27068579) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMar 21, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJun 01, 2023MYO6: PP3, BS1, BS2 -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 37 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 21, 2017p.Ala342Val in exon 11 of MYO6: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 0.24% (304/126610) of Non-Finnish E uropean chromosomes and 0.16% (42/25786) of Finnish chromosomes including 1 homo zygote by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute. org; dbSNP rs145564837). It has been previously reported by our laboratory in th e heterozygous state in 6 individuals with hearing loss, including 2 with differ ent alternate etiologies. ACMG/AMP criteria applied: BS1_supporting, BP5. -
Nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen Hearing Loss Variant Curation Expert PanelMar 25, 2019The filtering allele frequency of the p.Ala342Val variant in the MYO6 gene is 0.21% for European (non-Finnish) chromosomes by gnomAD (304/129090 with 95% CI), and one homozygous European (Finnish) individual, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal dominant hearing loss variants (BA1). The REVEL computational prediction analysis tool produced a score of 0.905, however, this information is not predictive of pathogenicity on its own and is not considered in conflict with evidence that supports a benign interpretation. In summary, the HL EP classified this variant as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the Hearing Loss Expert Panel: BA1. -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 22 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
MYO6-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesOct 29, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.14
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.44
Cadd
Uncertain
25
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.87
D;.;.;.;D;D
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.82
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.78
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D;.;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.33
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.25
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
1.1
D
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.84
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.8
D;D;D;.;D;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.91
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;D;D;.;D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0, 0.95
.;D;P;D;.;.
Vest4
0.98
MVP
0.96
MPC
0.26
ClinPred
0.40
T
GERP RS
5.4
gMVP
0.88

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145564837; hg19: chr6-76558195; API