rs145619075

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_018076.5(ODAD2):​c.2342G>T​(p.Gly781Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00244 in 1,613,984 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0025 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

ODAD2
NM_018076.5 missense

Scores

5
8
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.95

Publications

14 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ODAD2 (HGNC:25583): (outer dynein arm docking complex subunit 2) The protein encoded by this gene contains ten Armadillo repeat motifs (ARMs) and one HEAT repeat, and is thought to be involved in ciliary and flagellar movement. This protein has been shown to localize to the ciliary axonemes and at the ciliary base of respiratory cells. Studies indicate that mutations in this gene cause partial outer dynein arm (ODA) defects in respiratory cilia. The cilia of cells with mutations in this gene displayed either reduced ciliary beat frequency and amplitude, or, complete immotility. Some individuals with primary ciliary dyskensia (PCD) have been shown to have mutations in this gene. PCD is characterized by chronic airway disease and left/right body asymmetry defects. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2015]
ODAD2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia 23
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.12244466).
BP6
Variant 10-27935163-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-27935163-C-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 221004.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00196 (299/152258) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00331 (225/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00295. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 121 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ODAD2NM_018076.5 linkc.2342G>T p.Gly781Val missense_variant Exon 16 of 20 ENST00000305242.10 NP_060546.2 Q5T2S8-1A0A140VKF7B7Z7Y0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ODAD2ENST00000305242.10 linkc.2342G>T p.Gly781Val missense_variant Exon 16 of 20 1 NM_018076.5 ENSP00000306410.5 Q5T2S8-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00197
AC:
299
AN:
152140
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00125
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00259
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000830
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000471
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00331
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00209
AC:
525
AN:
251164
AF XY:
0.00219
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000492
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00156
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00268
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000323
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00335
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00359
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00249
AC:
3640
AN:
1461726
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00248
AC XY:
1805
AN XY:
727170
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000209
AC:
7
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00172
AC:
77
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00199
AC:
52
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39682
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00111
AC:
96
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000431
AC:
23
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00555
AC:
32
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00289
AC:
3215
AN:
1111888
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00227
AC:
137
AN:
60388
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
215
430
646
861
1076
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
110
220
330
440
550
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00196
AC:
299
AN:
152258
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00163
AC XY:
121
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000722
AC:
30
AN:
41562
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00124
AC:
19
AN:
15276
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00259
AC:
9
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000830
AC:
4
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000471
AC:
5
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00331
AC:
225
AN:
68014
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00284
AC:
6
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
17
35
52
70
87
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00268
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00207
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00243
AC:
9
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00337
AC:
13
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000908
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00360
AC:
31
ExAC
AF:
0.00199
AC:
242
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00398
EpiControl
AF:
0.00385

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3
Jun 01, 2021
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 20, 2024
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Reported without a second variant in a patient with Kartagener syndrome who harbored variants in other genes (PMID: 29402277); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29402277) -

Aug 15, 2023
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:1
Apr 13, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 23 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

ODAD2-related disorder Benign:1
May 08, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.43
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.10
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.080
CADD
Pathogenic
27
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.046
T
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.76
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.77
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.036
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.12
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.49
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.8
M
PhyloP100
5.0
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.77
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-6.4
D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.34
Sift
Uncertain
0.0060
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0060
D
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.85
MVP
0.85
MPC
0.63
ClinPred
0.057
T
GERP RS
5.9
Varity_R
0.78
gMVP
0.69
Mutation Taster
=87/13
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145619075; hg19: chr10-28224092; COSMIC: COSV99044428; API