rs145672251

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.3179A>T(p.Lys1060Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000509 in 1,613,924 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00052 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.91

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

DNAH5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

primary ciliary dyskinesia 3
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
primary ciliary dyskinesia
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

DNAH5 links:

ENSG00000251423 (HGNC:40187):

ENSG00000251423 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.034973532).

BP6

Variant 5-13882811-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13882811-T-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 351193.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAH5	NM_001369.3 link	c.3179A>T	p.Lys1060Met	missense_variant	Exon 21 of 79	ENST00000265104.5	NP_001360.1	Q8TE73

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAH5	ENST00000265104.5 link	c.3179A>T	p.Lys1060Met	missense_variant	Exon 21 of 79	1	NM_001369.3	ENSP00000265104.4	Q8TE73
DNAH5	ENST00000681290.1 link	c.3134A>T	p.Lys1045Met	missense_variant	Exon 21 of 79			ENSP00000505288.1	A0A7P0Z455
ENSG00000251423	ENST00000503244.2 link	n.254-13778T>A		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 2	4
ENSG00000251423	ENST00000637153.1 link	n.214-13778T>A		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 2	5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000368

AC:

AN:

152220

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000617

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000957

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000255

AC:

AN:

251210

AF XY:

0.000236

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000247

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000434

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000352

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000817

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000524

AC:

766

AN:

1461586

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000517

AC XY:

376

AN XY:

727138

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000179

AC:

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000626

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39692

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86246

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53408

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000640

AC:

711

AN:

1111750

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000331

AC:

AN:

60388

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

110

146

183

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

128

160

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000368

AC:

AN:

152338

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000376

AC XY:

AN XY:

74500

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000192

AC:

AN:

41584

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000261

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000617

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000947

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.471

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000625

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000393

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000539

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00104

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000465

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000280

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Nov 22, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 11, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.K1060M variant (also known as c.3179A>T), located in coding exon 21 of the DNAH5 gene, results from an A to T substitution at nucleotide position 3179. The lysine at codon 1060 is replaced by methionine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Oct 29, 2020

Revvity Omics, Revvity

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 07, 2022

Johns Hopkins Genomics, Johns Hopkins University

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Oct 05, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.12

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.39

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.42

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.13

Eigen

Benign

-0.42

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.32

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.94

LIST_S2

Benign

0.72

M_CAP

Benign

0.016

MetaRNN

Benign

0.035

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.2

PhyloP100

2.9

PrimateAI

Benign

0.32

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.4

REVEL

Benign

0.092

Sift

Uncertain

0.018

Polyphen

0.017

Vest4

0.43

MVP

0.46

MPC

0.45

ClinPred

0.061

GERP RS

2.1

Varity_R

0.19

gMVP

0.55

Mutation Taster

=95/5

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over