rs145731729

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_133497.4(KCNV2):c.80G>A(p.Arg27His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000424 in 1,614,194 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00060 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00041 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

KCNV2
NM_133497.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.20

Variant links:

Genes affected

KCNV2 (HGNC:19698): (potassium voltage-gated channel modifier subfamily V member 2) Voltage-gated potassium (Kv) channels represent the most complex class of voltage-gated ion channels from both functional and structural standpoints. Their diverse functions include regulating neurotransmitter release, heart rate, insulin secretion, neuronal excitability, epithelial electrolyte transport, smooth muscle contraction, and cell volume. This gene encodes a member of the potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily V. This member is identified as a 'silent subunit', and it does not form homomultimers, but forms heteromultimers with several other subfamily members. Through obligatory heteromerization, it exerts a function-altering effect on other potassium channel subunits. This protein is strongly expressed in pancreas and has a weaker expression in several other tissues. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

KCNV2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004309207).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000597 (91/152320) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0164 (85/5180). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0136. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 56 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
KCNV2	NM_133497.4 link	c.80G>A	p.Arg27His	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 2	ENST00000382082.4	NP_598004.1	Q8TDN2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
KCNV2	ENST00000382082.4 link	c.80G>A	p.Arg27His	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 2	1	NM_133497.4	ENSP00000371514.3		Q8TDN2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000591

AC:

AN:

152202

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0164

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00137

AC:

345

AN:

251384

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00128

AC XY:

174

AN XY:

135868

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0186

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000406

AC:

594

AN:

1461874

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000407

AC XY:

296

AN XY:

727240

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0141

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000117

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000281

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000597

AC:

AN:

152320

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000752

AC XY:

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0164

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0340

Hom.:

2817

Bravo

AF:

0.000725

ExAC

AF:

0.00134

AC:

163

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00260

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Jan 18, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Kyoto University

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Jun 10, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cone dystrophy with supernormal rod response

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Mar 18, 2016

Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical Center

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Retinal dystrophy

Uncertain:1

Jan 01, 2023

Institute of Human Genetics, Univ. Regensburg, Univ. Regensburg

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

KCNV2-related disorder

Benign:1

Apr 02, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Cone dystrophy 3

Benign:1

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.18

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.020

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.059

Eigen

Benign

-0.19

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.32

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.18

LIST_S2

Benign

0.75

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0043

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.40

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.1

PrimateAI

Benign

0.36

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.78

REVEL

Uncertain

0.34

Sift

Uncertain

0.010

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.017

Polyphen

1.0

Vest4

0.46

MVP

0.94

MPC

0.12

ClinPred

0.10

GERP RS

4.0

Varity_R

0.084

gMVP

0.50

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over