rs145771389

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_017636.4(TRPM4):c.988G>A(p.Glu330Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000214 in 1,613,888 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TRPM4
NM_017636.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.02

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TRPM4 (HGNC:17993): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 4) The protein encoded by this gene is a calcium-activated nonselective ion channel that mediates transport of monovalent cations across membranes, thereby depolarizing the membrane. The activity of the encoded protein increases with increasing intracellular calcium concentration, but this channel does not transport calcium. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]

TRPM4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

erythrokeratodermia variabilis et progressiva 6
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
progressive familial heart block type IB
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
erythrokeratodermia variabilis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
progressive familial heart block
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Brugada syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen

TRPM4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007197261).

BP6

Variant 19-49171707-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-49171707-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 329851.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 170 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TRPM4	NM_017636.4 link	c.988G>A	p.Glu330Lys	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 25	ENST00000252826.10	NP_060106.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TRPM4	ENST00000252826.10 link	c.988G>A	p.Glu330Lys	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 25	1	NM_017636.4	ENSP00000252826.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00112

AC:

170

AN:

152156

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00360

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000331

AC:

AN:

250604

AF XY:

0.000258

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00408

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000353

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000327

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000120

AC:

176

AN:

1461614

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000949

AC XY:

AN XY:

727104

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00335

AC:

112

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000425

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000153

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000348

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53156

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000520

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000135

AC:

AN:

1112000

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000331

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.467

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00112

AC:

170

AN:

152274

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00125

AC XY:

AN XY:

74462

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00358

AC:

149

AN:

41566

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00105

AC:

AN:

15294

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5164

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68004

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.489

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000387

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00132

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00250

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000354

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Progressive familial heart block type IB

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jan 21, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Jan 22, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 28, 2017

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Jul 16, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

TRPM4: BS1 -

TRPM4-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 18, 2021

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Sep 21, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.082

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.45

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.42

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.89

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.11

T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.48

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.41

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.73

LIST_S2

Benign

0.84

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.015

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0072

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.99

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.8

L;L

PhyloP100

3.0

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.53

PROVEAN

Benign

0.070

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.099

Sift

Benign

0.94

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.42

T;T

Polyphen

0.19

B;B

Vest4

0.45

MVP

0.59

MPC

0.44

ClinPred

0.012

GERP RS

4.0

Varity_R

0.072

gMVP

0.36

Mutation Taster

=95/5

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over