rs145805054
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_024675.4(PALB2):c.2365C>T(p.Leu789Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000155 in 1,614,200 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L789L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024675.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- Fanconi anemia complementation group NInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 3Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancerInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000959 AC: 146AN: 152216Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000267 AC: 67AN: 251398 AF XY: 0.000169 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000711 AC: 104AN: 1461866Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000591 AC XY: 43AN XY: 727236 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000958 AC: 146AN: 152334Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000872 AC XY: 65AN XY: 74502 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Variant summary: The PALB2 c.2365C>T (p.Leu789Leu) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. Mutation taster predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 42/121310 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0036538 (38/10400). This frequency is about 23 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic PALB2 variant (0.0001563), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign/likely benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:3
- -
Curators: Marc Tischkowitz, Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitter to LOVD: Marc Tischkowitz. -
This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
- -
- -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at