Menu
GeneBe

rs145911138

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_182961.4(SYNE1):c.10598G>A(p.Arg3533His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0173 in 1,614,102 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 306 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R3533C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 26 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.018 ( 280 hom. )

Consequence

SYNE1
NM_182961.4 missense

Scores

3
15

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.97
Variant links:
Genes affected
SYNE1 (HGNC:17089): (spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope protein 1) This gene encodes a spectrin repeat containing protein expressed in skeletal and smooth muscle, and peripheral blood lymphocytes, that localizes to the nuclear membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 8, also referred to as autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 1 or recessive ataxia of Beauce. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, SYNE1
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0023521185).
BP6
Variant 6-152358383-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-152358383-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 130391.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-152358383-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr6-152358383-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0123 (1870/152268) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.018 (1224/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0172. There are 26 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 881 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 1871 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SYNE1NM_182961.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.10598G>A p.Arg3533His missense_variant 66/146 ENST00000367255.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SYNE1ENST00000367255.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.10598G>A p.Arg3533His missense_variant 66/1461 NM_182961.4 P1Q8NF91-1
SYNE1ENST00000423061.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.10619G>A p.Arg3540His missense_variant 66/1461
SYNE1ENST00000471834.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.3736G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 9/191

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0123
AC:
1871
AN:
152150
Hom.:
26
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0692
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0338
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0136
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0180
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0178
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0125
AC:
3135
AN:
251466
Hom.:
28
AF XY:
0.0128
AC XY:
1735
AN XY:
135908
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00320
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00448
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0272
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0143
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0165
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0124
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0179
AC:
26129
AN:
1461834
Hom.:
280
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0177
AC XY:
12840
AN XY:
727220
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00287
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00438
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0267
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000756
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0148
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0128
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0198
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0184
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0123
AC:
1870
AN:
152268
Hom.:
26
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0118
AC XY:
881
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00366
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00458
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0338
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0124
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0136
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0180
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0171
Alfa
AF:
0.0164
Hom.:
26
Bravo
AF:
0.0114
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0197
AC:
73
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0187
AC:
72
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00545
AC:
24
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0200
AC:
172
ExAC
AF:
0.0118
AC:
1436
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00722
AC:
25
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0176
EpiControl
AF:
0.0170

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJul 08, 2019- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesAug 21, 2023- -
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 19, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type;C2751807:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.075
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.59
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
Cadd
Benign
20
Dann
Benign
0.93
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.21
T;.;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.24
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.093
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.76
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.92
D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0024
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.94
L;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.97
D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.028
Sift
Benign
0.16
T;.;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0050
D;D;D
Polyphen
0.025
B;.;.
Vest4
0.23
MPC
0.17
ClinPred
0.0092
T
GERP RS
3.2
Varity_R
0.083
gMVP
0.072

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145911138; hg19: chr6-152679518; COSMIC: COSV54946115; API