rs1459518095
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):āc.4330C>Gā(p.Pro1444Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000311 in 1,608,888 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | NM_000548.5 | c.4330C>G | p.Pro1444Ala | missense_variant | 34/42 | ENST00000219476.9 | NP_000539.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | ENST00000219476.9 | c.4330C>G | p.Pro1444Ala | missense_variant | 34/42 | 5 | NM_000548.5 | ENSP00000219476.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000417 AC: 1AN: 239996Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000759 AC XY: 1AN XY: 131668
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000275 AC: 4AN: 1456664Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000276 AC XY: 2AN XY: 724832
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74356
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Uncertain:3Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 14, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Jan 03, 2019 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 12, 2023 | This missense variant replaces proline with alanine at codon 1444 of the TSC2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with TSC2-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/239996 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 16, 2023 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 19, 2024 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at