Menu
GeneBe

rs145967477

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_001042432.2(CLN3):c.768C>T(p.Thr256=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000361 in 1,610,850 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T256T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00094 ( 1 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00030 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CLN3
NM_001042432.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.23
Variant links:
Genes affected
CLN3 (HGNC:2074): (CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein, battenin) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in lysosomal function. Mutations in this, as well as other neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinosis (CLN) genes, cause neurodegenerative diseases commonly known as Batten disease or collectively known as neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs). Many alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 16-28484028-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-28484028-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 93505.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr16-28484028-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr16-28484028-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.23 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CLN3NM_001042432.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.768C>T p.Thr256= synonymous_variant 10/16 ENST00000636147.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CLN3ENST00000636147.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.768C>T p.Thr256= synonymous_variant 10/161 NM_001042432.2 P1Q13286-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000940
AC:
143
AN:
152080
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00239
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00864
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000655
AC:
160
AN:
244296
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000659
AC XY:
87
AN XY:
132096
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00778
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000495
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000101
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000172
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000670
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000301
AC:
439
AN:
1458652
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000285
AC XY:
207
AN XY:
725222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00269
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000316
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00746
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000303
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000469
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000621
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000863
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000940
AC:
143
AN:
152198
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000968
AC XY:
72
AN XY:
74408
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00238
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00864
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000579
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000916
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00105
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 22, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoDec 14, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 18, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabAug 10, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.May 20, 2019- -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMar 09, 2018- -
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024- -
Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinosis, Dominant/Recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 08, 2017This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.85
Cadd
Benign
0.35
Dann
Benign
0.48
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145967477; hg19: chr16-28495349; API