rs145992727

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_006073.4(TRDN):c.84C>T(p.Pro28Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000136 in 1,613,952 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00064 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000083 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TRDN
NM_006073.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.262

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TRDN (HGNC:12261): (triadin) This gene encodes an integral membrane protein found in skeletal and cardiac muscle. The encoded protein plays a role in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling as part of the calcium release complex and is required for normal skeletal muscle strength. This protein indirectly links triads and microtubules in skeletal muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with cardiac arrythmia syndrome and some variants in this gene may be associated with sudden cardiac death. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TRDN Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 5
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
familial long QT syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
long QT syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen

TRDN links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).

BP6

Variant 6-123571071-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-123571071-G-A is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 228027.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.262 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000644 (98/152290) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00224 (93/41554). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00187. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 52 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TRDN	NM_006073.4 link	c.84C>T	p.Pro28Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 41	ENST00000334268.9	NP_006064.2	Q13061-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TRDN	ENST00000334268.9 link	c.84C>T	p.Pro28Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 41	1	NM_006073.4	ENSP00000333984.5		Q13061-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000637

AC:

AN:

152172

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00222

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000942

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000201

AC:

AN:

249154

AF XY:

0.000170

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00200

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000435

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000886

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000496

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000828

AC:

121

AN:

1461662

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000619

AC XY:

AN XY:

727112

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00233

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000313

AC:

AN:

44718

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000375

AC:

AN:

53398

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000450

AC:

AN:

1111830

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000364

AC:

AN:

60374

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.471

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000644

AC:

AN:

152290

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000698

AC XY:

AN XY:

74466

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00224

AC:

AN:

41554

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000196

AC:

AN:

15294

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5178

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000942

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68036

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.508

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000578

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000805

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1

Mar 23, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Pro28Pro in exon 2 of TRDN: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located with in the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.2% (24/9800) of Af rican chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadin stitute.org; dbSNP rs145992727). -

not provided

Benign:1

Mar 09, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1

Benign:1

Dec 26, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Mar 19, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.46

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.59

PhyloP100

0.26

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over