rs145999595
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1
The NM_130837.3(OPA1):c.2592T>C(p.Leu864Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000343 in 1,613,496 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_130837.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant optic atrophy, classic formInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
- optic atrophyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- optic atrophy with or without deafness, ophthalmoplegia, myopathy, ataxia, and neuropathyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- OPA1-related optic atrophy with or without extraocular featuresInheritance: SD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Behr syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 14 (cardioencephalomyopathic type)Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Leigh syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
- autosomal dominant optic atrophy plus syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPA1 | NM_130837.3 | c.2592T>C | p.Leu864Leu | synonymous_variant | Exon 26 of 31 | ENST00000361510.8 | NP_570850.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPA1 | ENST00000361510.8 | c.2592T>C | p.Leu864Leu | synonymous_variant | Exon 26 of 31 | 5 | NM_130837.3 | ENSP00000355324.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000191 AC: 29AN: 152142Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000956 AC: 24AN: 251098 AF XY: 0.000103 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000359 AC: 525AN: 1461354Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000308 AC XY: 224AN XY: 726982 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000191 AC: 29AN: 152142Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000175 AC XY: 13AN XY: 74326 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
- -
OPA1: BP4, BP7 -
- -
- -
Autosomal dominant optic atrophy classic form Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
OPA1-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at