rs146033170

chr5-36955605-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_133433.4(NIPBL):c.198C>G(p.Val66=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000402 in 1,613,916 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00033 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00041 (2 hom.)
• Consequence: NIPBL NM_133433.4 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.0950

Genes affected

NIPBL (HGNC:28862): (NIPBL cohesin loading factor) This gene encodes the homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B gene product and fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins. The Drosophila protein facilitates enhancer-promoter communication of remote enhancers and plays a role in developmental regulation. It is also homologous to a family of chromosomal adherins with broad roles in sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and DNA repair. The human protein has a bipartite nuclear targeting sequence and a putative HEAT repeat. Condensins, cohesins and other complexes with chromosome-related functions also contain HEAT repeats. Mutations in this gene result in Cornelia de Lange syndrome, a disorder characterized by dysmorphic facial features, growth delay, limb reduction defects, and cognitive disability. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).
• BP6: Variant 5-36955605-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-36955605-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 96332.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.095 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000408 (597/1461662) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00255 (114/44722). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00217. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 264 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd at 51 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
NIPBL	NM_133433.4	c.198C>G	p.Val66=	synonymous_variant	3/47	ENST00000282516.13

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
NIPBL	ENST00000282516.13	c.198C>G	p.Val66=	synonymous_variant	3/47	1	NM_133433.4	P1
NIPBL	ENST00000448238.2	c.198C>G	p.Val66=	synonymous_variant	3/46	1
NIPBL	ENST00000652901.1	c.198C>G	p.Val66=	synonymous_variant	3/46
NIPBL	ENST00000505998.5	n.177C>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	2/8	5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000335 AC: 51 AN: 152136 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000483

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000720

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00144

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000470

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000724 AC: 182 AN: 251248 Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000619 AC XY: 84 AN XY: 135782

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00275

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00169

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000440

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00326

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000408 AC: 597 AN: 1461662 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000363 AC XY: 264 AN XY: 727140

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00255

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00134

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000374

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000497

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000335 AC: 51 AN: 152254 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000282 AC XY: 21 AN XY: 74452

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000481

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000719

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00144

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000470

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000473

Alfa AF: 0.000425 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000529

EpiCase AF: 0.000382

EpiControl AF: 0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Oct 28, 2020	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Apr 29, 2015	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Feb 13, 2015	- -

Cornelia de Lange syndrome 1 Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Apr 27, 2017	This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 29, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Jul 15, 2021	- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jul 13, 2016

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Jan 16, 2020

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.47
Cadd	Benign	7.7
Dann	Benign	0.67
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.7

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146033170; hg19: chr5-36955707;