rs146151670
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_006514.4(SCN10A):c.853G>A(p.Glu285Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000738 in 1,608,048 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006514.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN10A | NM_006514.4 | c.853G>A | p.Glu285Lys | missense_variant | 7/28 | ENST00000449082.3 | NP_006505.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN10A | ENST00000449082.3 | c.853G>A | p.Glu285Lys | missense_variant | 7/28 | 1 | NM_006514.4 | ENSP00000390600 | P4 | |
SCN10A | ENST00000655275.1 | c.853G>A | p.Glu285Lys | missense_variant | 7/28 | ENSP00000499510 | ||||
SCN10A | ENST00000643924.1 | c.853G>A | p.Glu285Lys | missense_variant | 6/27 | ENSP00000495595 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000514 AC: 78AN: 151832Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000427 AC: 107AN: 250782Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000406 AC XY: 55AN XY: 135540
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000761 AC: 1108AN: 1456098Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000719 AC XY: 521AN XY: 724390
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000513 AC: 78AN: 151950Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000431 AC XY: 32AN XY: 74306
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 25, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
SCN10A-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 04, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Brugada syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 26, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at