rs146175803

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_005422.4(TECTA):c.2657A>G(p.Asn886Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000814 in 1,612,962 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00060 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00084 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TECTA
NM_005422.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.12

Variant links:

Genes affected

TECTA (HGNC:11720): (tectorin alpha) The tectorial membrane is an extracellular matrix of the inner ear that contacts the stereocilia bundles of specialized sensory hair cells. Sound induces movement of these hair cells relative to the tectorial membrane, deflects the stereocilia, and leads to fluctuations in hair-cell membrane potential, transducing sound into electrical signals. Alpha-tectorin is one of the major noncollagenous components of the tectorial membrane. Mutations in the TECTA gene have been shown to be responsible for autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing impairment and a recessive form of sensorineural pre-lingual non-syndromic deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

TECTA links:

TBCEL-TECTA (HGNC:54857): (TBCEL-TECTA readthrough) Predicted to enable alpha-tubulin binding activity. Predicted to be involved in microtubule cytoskeleton organization; post-chaperonin tubulin folding pathway; and tubulin complex assembly. Predicted to be active in cytoplasm. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

TBCEL-TECTA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.07219997).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000604 (92/152298) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000956 (65/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000769. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 36 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TECTA	NM_005422.4 link	c.2657A>G	p.Asn886Ser	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 24	ENST00000392793.6	NP_005413.2	O75443
TBCEL-TECTA	NM_001378761.1 link	c.3614A>G	p.Asn1205Ser	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 30		NP_001365690.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TECTA	ENST00000392793.6 link	c.2657A>G	p.Asn886Ser	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 24	5	NM_005422.4	ENSP00000376543.1	O75443
TECTA	ENST00000264037.2 link	c.2657A>G	p.Asn886Ser	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 23	1		ENSP00000264037.2	O75443
TECTA	ENST00000642222.1 link	c.2657A>G	p.Asn886Ser	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 24			ENSP00000493855.1	A0A2R8YDL0
TECTA	ENST00000645008.1 link	c.-38A>G		upstream_gene_variant				ENSP00000496274.1	A0A2R8YGQ5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000605

AC:

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000314

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000282

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000955

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000475

AC:

119

AN:

250476

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000436

AC XY:

AN XY:

135330

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000376

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000418

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000821

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000836

AC:

1221

AN:

1460664

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000807

AC XY:

586

AN XY:

726478

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000120

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000515

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000393

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000997

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00103

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000604

AC:

AN:

152298

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000483

AC XY:

AN XY:

74470

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000313

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000282

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000956

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000632

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000525

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000809

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000519

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000582

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000395

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000709

EpiControl

AF:

0.00107

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Jan 27, 2025

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Reported in published literature in unrelated individuals with suspected autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss, each with a second TECTA variant, but it is not known whether the variants occurred on the same (in cis) or on different (in trans) chromosomes (PMID: 27068579, 29196752); Reported in published literature in association with autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing loss in one family, where it was identified in cis with a splicing variant in the TECTA gene in all affected individuals tested (PMID: 21520338); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Within the ZA, zonadhesin and VWFD2, von Willebrand factor type D2 domains (PMID: 21520338, 31554319, 9590290); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25262649, 22995349, 27368438, 30245029, 29196752, 21520338, 27068579, 31554319, 9590290) -

Feb 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 04, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 21

Uncertain:2

Aug 28, 2019

Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

A heterozygous missense variant, NM_005422.2(TECTA):c.2657A>G, has been identified in exon 9 of 23 of the TECTA gene. The variant is predicted to result in a minor amino acid change from asparagine to serine at position 886 of the protein (NP_005413.2(TECTA):p.Asn886Ser). The asparagine residue at this position has high conservation (100 vertebrates, UCSC), and is located within the VWFD 2 functional domain. In silico predictions for this variant are conflicting (Polyphen, SIFT, CADD, Mutation Taster). The variant is present in the gnomAD database at a frequency of 0.046% (130 heterozygotes). The variant has been previously described as a VUS and likely benign (ClinVar, Deafnessvariationdatabase, LOVD, Shearer, A. E., et al. (2014), Baux, D., et al. (2017)). An alternative change to histidine has also been reported as a VUS (Deafnessvariationdatabase). Based on the information available at the time of curation, this variant has been classified as a VARIANT of UNCERTAIN SIGNIFICANCE with LOW CLINICAL RELEVANCE. -

Apr 28, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Nov 27, 2019

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.Asn886Ser variant in TECTA has been previously reported in 7 individuals with sensorineural hearing loss (Baux 2017, Hildebrand 2011, Sommen 2016, Baux 2017, LMM data). In 3 of these individuals a second TECTA variant was identified (p.Glu1950del, p.Val205Leu, p.Cys1372*), though only one was likely to be pathogenic (p.Cys1372*). Furthermore, one of the previously reported probands had a family history of autosomal dominant hearing loss, and while the variant segregated with the disease in 12 affected family members, a more likely pathogenic variant in TECTA (c.5383+5_5383+8delGTGA) was identified in cis with p.Asn886Ser, suggesting that p.Asn886Ser was less likely related to the hearing loss in this family (Hildebrand, 2011). This variant has been identified in 0.07% (98/128646) of European chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that the p.Asn886Ser variant may impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to determine pathogenicity. In summary, due to conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of the p.Asn886Ser variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PM3, PP3, BS1_Supporting, BP2. -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 12;C1863655:Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 21

Uncertain:1

Sep 08, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 12

Uncertain:1

Apr 28, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.23

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.39

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.42

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.13

T;.;T

Eigen

Uncertain

0.56

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.59

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.92

.;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.016

MetaRNN

Benign

0.072

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.93

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.1

M;.;M

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.78

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.77

N;.;N

REVEL

Benign

0.23

Sift

Benign

0.23

T;.;T

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;.;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;.;D

Vest4

0.80

MVP

0.74

MPC

0.85

ClinPred

0.080

GERP RS

5.7

Varity_R

0.13

gMVP

0.59

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over