rs146191243
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.3987A>G(p.Lys1329Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0143 in 1,614,002 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 216 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001369.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- primary ciliary dyskinesia 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001369.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNAH5 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.3987A>G | p.Lys1329Lys | synonymous | Exon 25 of 79 | ENSP00000265104.4 | Q8TE73 | ||
| DNAH5 | c.3942A>G | p.Lys1314Lys | synonymous | Exon 25 of 79 | ENSP00000505288.1 | A0A7P0Z455 | |||
| DNAH5-AS1 | TSL:4 | n.253+7285T>C | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00989 AC: 1505AN: 152108Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0109 AC: 2728AN: 251142 AF XY: 0.0112 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0147 AC: 21499AN: 1461776Hom.: 204 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0144 AC XY: 10499AN XY: 727200 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00989 AC: 1505AN: 152226Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00961 AC XY: 715AN XY: 74436 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at