rs146239734

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.4045G>A(p.Ala1349Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000416 in 1,608,752 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A1349V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00019 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000026 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0100

Publications

10 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

tuberous sclerosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
tuberous sclerosis 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
tuberous sclerosis complex
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

TSC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.049489945).

BP6

Variant 16-2084267-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2084267-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 207751.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000191 (29/152230) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.000675 (28/41454). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000479. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 14 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 29 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TSC2	NM_000548.5 link	c.4045G>A	p.Ala1349Thr	missense_variant	Exon 34 of 42	ENST00000219476.9	NP_000539.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TSC2	ENST00000219476.9 link	c.4045G>A	p.Ala1349Thr	missense_variant	Exon 34 of 42	5	NM_000548.5	ENSP00000219476.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000191

AC:

AN:

152230

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000675

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000376

AC:

AN:

239656

AF XY:

0.0000460

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000525

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000938

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000261

AC:

AN:

1456522

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000276

AC XY:

AN XY:

724144

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000719

AC:

AN:

33358

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000225

AC:

AN:

44410

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26052

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000253

AC:

AN:

39522

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

85388

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

51784

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000901

AC:

AN:

1110046

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000166

AC:

AN:

60194

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.488

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000191

AC:

AN:

152230

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000188

AC XY:

AN XY:

74362

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000675

AC:

AN:

41454

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15290

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5194

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10632

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68036

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000478

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.506

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000317

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000219

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000457

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000332

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 2

Benign:3

Aug 20, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 07, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Dec 07, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

Sep 11, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Benign:1

Mar 21, 2022

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The frequency of this variant in the general population (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Computational tools predict this amino acid change may be benign. This variant has been seen where an alternate explanation for disease was also identified. -

TSC2-related disorder

Benign:1

Nov 09, 2021

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not provided

Benign:1

Mar 13, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.067

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.16

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.090

CADD

Benign

0.53

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.73

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.35

T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-1.3

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.3

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.065

LIST_S2

Benign

0.82

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.059

MetaRNN

Benign

0.049

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.66

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.90

L;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

PhyloP100

-0.010

PrimateAI

Benign

0.27

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.63

N;.;.;N;.;N;.;.;N;N;.;.;.;.;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.59

Sift

Benign

0.30

T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;.;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.88

T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;.;T

Polyphen

0.10

B;.;.;.;B;B;.;.;B;B;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.14

MVP

0.99

ClinPred

0.011

GERP RS

-1.7

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.040

gMVP

0.35

Mutation Taster

=95/5

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over