rs146325649

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_020937.4(FANCM):c.2173A>G(p.Thr725Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000069 in 1,608,250 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T725S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00047 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000027 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

FANCM
NM_020937.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.370

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

FANCM (HGNC:23168): (FA complementation group M) The Fanconi anemia complementation group (FANC) currently includes FANCA, FANCB, FANCC, FANCD1 (also called BRCA2), FANCD2, FANCE, FANCF, FANCG, FANCI, FANCJ (also called BRIP1), FANCL, FANCM and FANCN (also called PALB2). The previously defined group FANCH is the same as FANCA. Fanconi anemia is a genetically heterogeneous recessive disorder characterized by cytogenetic instability, hypersensitivity to DNA crosslinking agents, increased chromosomal breakage, and defective DNA repair. The members of the Fanconi anemia complementation group do not share sequence similarity; they are related by their assembly into a common nuclear protein complex. This gene encodes the protein for complementation group M. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2015]

FANCM Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Fanconi anemia
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet
spermatogenic failure 28
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
male infertility with azoospermia or oligozoospermia due to single gene mutation
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
breast cancer
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

FANCM links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010558844).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000467 (71/152150) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00166 (69/41442). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00135. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 35 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FANCM	NM_020937.4 link	c.2173A>G	p.Thr725Ala	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 23	ENST00000267430.10	NP_065988.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FANCM	ENST00000267430.10 link	c.2173A>G	p.Thr725Ala	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 23	1	NM_020937.4	ENSP00000267430.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000467

AC:

AN:

152150

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00166

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000876

AC:

AN:

251150

AF XY:

0.0000884

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00129

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000881

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000275

AC:

AN:

1456100

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000248

AC XY:

AN XY:

724750

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00102

AC:

AN:

33354

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44706

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26098

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39616

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86112

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53402

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5756

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000271

AC:

AN:

1106856

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000498

AC:

AN:

60200

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.445

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000467

AC:

AN:

152150

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000471

AC XY:

AN XY:

74318

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00166

AC:

AN:

41442

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15266

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2088

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.519

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000388

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000408

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000681

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000741

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2

Nov 07, 2024

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge

Oct 20, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The FANCM c.2173A>G (p.Thr725Ala) variant has not been reported in individuals with FANCM-related conditions in the published literature. The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0014 (36/24966 chromosomes in African/African American subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant.

Fanconi anemia

Uncertain:1

Dec 22, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 725 of the FANCM protein (p.Thr725Ala). This variant is present in population databases (rs146325649, gnomAD 0.1%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with FANCM-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 526312). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function outputs the following: PolyPhen-2: "Benign". The alanine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1

Jun 30, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

Spermatogenic failure 28

Uncertain:1

Jun 20, 2020

Baylor Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868].

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.067

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.62

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.69

CADD

Benign

0.10

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.22

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.073

T;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-1.6

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.5

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.0072

LIST_S2

Benign

0.40

T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.0027

MetaRNN

Benign

0.011

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.4

L;.;.

PhyloP100

0.37

PrimateAI

Benign

0.24

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.87

N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.11

Sift

Benign

0.39

T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.54

T;T;T

Vest4

0.20

ClinPred

0.0044

GERP RS

-0.67

Varity_R

0.13

gMVP

0.28

Mutation Taster

=81/19

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over