Menu
GeneBe

rs146382972

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.334G>A(p.Ala112Thr) variant causes a missense, splice region change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000146 in 1,604,732 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A112V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00072 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000086 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 missense, splice_region

Scores

1
6
10

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.35
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.016045034).
BP6
Variant 11-108235672-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108235672-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127370.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=4, Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=5}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000722 (110/152254) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00248 (103/41552). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00209. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 52 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.334G>A p.Ala112Thr missense_variant, splice_region_variant 5/63 ENST00000675843.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.334G>A p.Ala112Thr missense_variant, splice_region_variant 5/63 NM_000051.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000730
AC:
111
AN:
152136
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000208
AC:
52
AN:
250218
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000133
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
135384
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00280
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000203
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000861
AC:
125
AN:
1452478
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0000678
AC XY:
49
AN XY:
723078
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00280
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000466
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000181
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000216
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000722
AC:
110
AN:
152254
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000699
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
74432
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000945
Alfa
AF:
0.000159
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000865
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00227
AC:
10
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000214
AC:
26

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 05, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoSep 22, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 12, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25318351, 25980754, 17333338, 27443514, 27720647, 19781682, 28779002, 23555315, 33095795) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 10, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 11, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Feb 14, 2017- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoOct 07, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 16, 2023Variant summary: ATM c.334G>A (p.Ala112Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Telomere-length maintenance and DNA damage repair domain (IPR021668) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00021 in 250408 control chromosomes (gnomAD, Hirsch_2008), predominantly at a frequency of 0.0028 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 3 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ATM causing Breast Cancer phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. The variant has also been found in 13/2559 (carrier freq=0.00508) African American women over the age of 70 without history of cancer (FLOSSIES dataset). c.334G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer, Lynch Syndrome, endometrial carcinoma, cerebellar ataxia, primary ovarian insufficiency and PDAC (examples: Tung_2014, Yurgelun_2015, Ring_2016, Coutelier_2018, Mullins_2019, Weitzel_2019, Franca_2020, Zimmermann_2021), but it was also reported in healthy controls (examples: Hirsch_2008, Weitzel_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Ten ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: five classified the variant as uncertain significance, three as likely benign, and two as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsAug 22, 2023- -
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 23, 2017- -
ATM-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJan 01, 2024The ATM c.334G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Ala112Thr. This variant has been reported in two individuals with breast cancer (Tung et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 25186627; Mullins and Gupta. 2019. PubMed ID: 31719806), in an individual with endometrial cancer (Ring et al. 2016. PubMed ID: 27443514, Table S2), an individual with primary ovarian insufficiency (França et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 33095795), and in at least two individuals undergoing Lynch syndrome genetic testing (Yorczyk et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 25318351, Table 2; Yurgelun et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 25980754, Table S2). It has also been reported in controls from breast cancer cohort studies (Hirsch et al. 2007. PubMed ID: 17333338; Tavtigian et al. 2009. PubMed ID: 19781682. Table S2). This variant is reported in 0.27% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD, which is significantly more common than other known disease-causing ATM variants. In ClinVar, this variant has conflicting interpretations of benign, likely benign, and uncertain significance (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/127370/). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The ATM p.Ala112Thr variant was identified in 4 of 17948 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0002) from individuals or families with breast cancer or Lynch syndrome and was present in 2 of 4988 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004) from healthy individuals (Haiman 2013, Hirsch 2008, Ring 2016, Tavtigian 2009, Yorczyk 2015, Yurgelun 2015). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs146382972) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae and Ambry Genetics; as uncertain significance by GeneDx and five other submitters), and MutDB. The variant was not identified in COGR, Cosmic, or LOVD 3.0 databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 74 of 276196 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 66 of 23976 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), Other in 1 of 6434 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), and Latino in 7 of 34316 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), while the variant was not observed in the European, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Ala112 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.22
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.38
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.32
Cadd
Uncertain
24
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.48
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.50
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
D;D;D;.;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.069
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.016
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.35
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.56
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.39
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.9
N;N;.;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.11
Sift
Uncertain
0.011
D;D;.;D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.019
D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.87
.;P;.;P;.
Vest4
0.13, 0.060, 0.18
MVP
0.91
MPC
0.27
ClinPred
0.033
T
GERP RS
4.7
Varity_R
0.21
gMVP
0.39

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146382972; hg19: chr11-108106399; API