Menu
GeneBe

rs146424724

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM2PP3_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_001375808.2(LPIN2):ā€‹c.1514T>Cā€‹(p.Ile505Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000211 in 1,605,446 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā˜…ā˜…). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I505M) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00022 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

LPIN2
NM_001375808.2 missense

Scores

10
6
3

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.80
Variant links:
Genes affected
LPIN2 (HGNC:14450): (lipin 2) Mouse studies suggest that this gene functions during normal adipose tissue development and may play a role in human triglyceride metabolism. This gene represents a candidate gene for human lipodystrophy, characterized by loss of body fat, fatty liver, hypertriglyceridemia, and insulin resistance. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.845
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00022 (319/1453092) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000276 (305/1104272). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00025. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 146 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 28. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
LPIN2NM_001375808.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1514T>C p.Ile505Thr missense_variant 10/20 ENST00000677752.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
LPIN2ENST00000677752.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1514T>C p.Ile505Thr missense_variant 10/20 NM_001375808.2 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000125
AC:
19
AN:
152236
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000235
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000167
AC:
42
AN:
251220
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000147
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
135826
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000334
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000220
AC:
319
AN:
1453092
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.000202
AC XY:
146
AN XY:
723534
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000300
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000671
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000253
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000750
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000276
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000500
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000125
AC:
19
AN:
152354
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000805
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74506
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000240
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000235
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000264
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000128
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000582
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
0.000157
AC:
19
EpiCase
AF:
0.000327
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Majeed syndrome Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 22, 2023This sequence change replaces isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with threonine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 505 of the LPIN2 protein (p.Ile505Thr). This variant is present in population databases (rs146424724, gnomAD 0.03%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with LPIN2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 234337). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on LPIN2 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 29, 2022The c.1514T>C (p.I505T) alteration is located in exon 10 (coding exon 9) of the LPIN2 gene. This alteration results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 1514, causing the isoleucine (I) at amino acid position 505 to be replaced by a threonine (T). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 11, 2015The I505T variant has not been published as a mutation, nor has it been reported as a benign polymorphism to our knowledge. It was not observed at any significant frequency in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project. I505T is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. The position where this substitution occurs in the LPIN2 protein is highly conserved among species; however, it is not located in one of the known conserved domain regions of the LPIN2 protein (Reue et al., 2009). In silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. In addition, a missense mutation in a nearby residue (L504F) has been reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database in association with psoriasis (Stenson et al., 2014), supporting the functional importance of this region of the protein. Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic mutation or a rare benign variant. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.29
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.25
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.43
CADD
Pathogenic
26
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.34
T
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.91
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.89
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.27
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.84
D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.57
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.5
M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.88
D
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.5
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.87
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0040
D
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.93
MVP
0.70
MPC
0.97
ClinPred
0.82
D
GERP RS
6.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.63
gMVP
0.84

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146424724; hg19: chr18-2929099; API