rs146451037

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2_Supporting

The NM_024570.4(RNASEH2B):​c.455A>G​(p.Asn152Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000902 in 1,600,830 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. N152N) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00062 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00093 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

RNASEH2B
NM_024570.4 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.808

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RNASEH2B (HGNC:25671): (ribonuclease H2 subunit B) RNase H2 is composed of a single catalytic subunit (A) and two non-catalytic subunits (B and C) and specifically degrades the RNA of RNA:DNA hybrids. The protein encoded by this gene is the non-catalytic B subunit of RNase H2, which is thought to play a role in DNA replication. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. Defects in this gene are a cause of Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome type 2 (AGS2). [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]
RNASEH2B Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010262281).
BP6
Variant 13-50943339-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-50943339-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 312330.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RNASEH2BNM_024570.4 linkc.455A>G p.Asn152Ser missense_variant Exon 6 of 11 ENST00000336617.8 NP_078846.2 Q5TBB1-1Q8N451

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RNASEH2BENST00000336617.8 linkc.455A>G p.Asn152Ser missense_variant Exon 6 of 11 1 NM_024570.4 ENSP00000337623.2 Q5TBB1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000618
AC:
94
AN:
152158
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00490
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000852
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000479
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000754
AC:
189
AN:
250776
AF XY:
0.000797
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000493
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00357
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00102
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000653
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000932
AC:
1350
AN:
1448554
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.000980
AC XY:
707
AN XY:
721468
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000121
AC:
4
AN:
33184
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000493
AC:
22
AN:
44634
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00411
AC:
107
AN:
26044
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39556
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000292
AC:
25
AN:
85748
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000562
AC:
3
AN:
53400
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000174
AC:
1
AN:
5732
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00102
AC:
1125
AN:
1100326
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00105
AC:
63
AN:
59930
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.446
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
58
116
174
232
290
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
46
92
138
184
230
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000617
AC:
94
AN:
152276
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000551
AC XY:
41
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000241
AC:
10
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000262
AC:
4
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00490
AC:
17
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000943
AC:
1
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000853
AC:
58
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000474
AC:
1
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5
10
16
21
26
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00107
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000646
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000809
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00104
AC:
4
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000681
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000698
AC:
6
ExAC
AF:
0.000791
AC:
96
EpiCase
AF:
0.00125
EpiControl
AF:
0.00124

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 2 Uncertain:2Benign:2
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Oct 08, 2021
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2016
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 13, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.064
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.36
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.50
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.25
T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.74
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.59
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.18
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.82
T;T;D;D;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;D;T;T;.;.;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.054
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.010
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.37
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.20
N;N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
PhyloP100
0.81
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.48
N;N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.23
Sift
Benign
0.74
T;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Polyphen
0.0030
B;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.049
MVP
0.69
MPC
0.043
ClinPred
0.00056
T
GERP RS
-1.3
PromoterAI
-0.0050
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Varity_R
0.037
gMVP
0.063
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146451037; hg19: chr13-51517475; API