rs146469162
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_000179.3(MSH6):c.491A>C(p.His164Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000452 in 1,614,166 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H164L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000179.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH6 | NM_000179.3 | c.491A>C | p.His164Pro | missense_variant | 3/10 | ENST00000234420.11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH6 | ENST00000234420.11 | c.491A>C | p.His164Pro | missense_variant | 3/10 | 1 | NM_000179.3 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000302 AC: 46AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000716 AC: 18AN: 251422Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000809 AC XY: 11AN XY: 135890
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000185 AC: 27AN: 1461874Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000165 AC XY: 12AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000302 AC: 46AN: 152292Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000255 AC XY: 19AN XY: 74472
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 17, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Feb 24, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 20, 2021 | - - |
Lynch syndrome 5 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 27, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 29, 2023 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 03, 2022 | Variant summary: MSH6 c.491A>C (p.His164Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the PWWP domain (IPR000313) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 7.2e-05 in 251422 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00098 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 7 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MSH6 causing Lynch syndrome/Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer phenotype (0.00014), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. c.491A>C has been reported in the literature as a VUS in settings of multigene panel testing in at-least one individual affected with Breast Cancer (example, Tung_2015). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer/Lynch syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been observed at our laboratory (MSH2 c.942+3A>T), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and a predominant consensus as likely benign (n=7) (VUS, n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Nov 23, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jan 30, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 14, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23621914, 25186627) - |
MSH6-related condition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 27, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at