Menu
GeneBe

rs146504061

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000057.4(BLM):c.968A>G(p.Lys323Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000893 in 1,613,702 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K323Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00052 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00093 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BLM
NM_000057.4 missense

Scores

5
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:12B:2O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.11
Variant links:
Genes affected
BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.11627719).
BP6
Variant 15-90754819-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-90754819-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127518.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {not_provided=1, Uncertain_significance=10, Likely_benign=2}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BLMNM_000057.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.968A>G p.Lys323Arg missense_variant 5/22 ENST00000355112.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BLMENST00000355112.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.968A>G p.Lys323Arg missense_variant 5/221 NM_000057.4 P2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000519
AC:
79
AN:
152200
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000999
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000371
AC:
93
AN:
250780
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000369
AC XY:
50
AN XY:
135548
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000732
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000491
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000932
AC:
1362
AN:
1461502
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000923
AC XY:
671
AN XY:
727024
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000239
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000112
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000188
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000894
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000519
AC:
79
AN:
152200
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000498
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000999
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000478
Alfa
AF:
0.000859
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000427
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00108
AC:
4
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00130
AC:
5
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000698
AC:
6
ExAC
AF:
0.000288
AC:
35
EpiCase
AF:
0.000763
EpiControl
AF:
0.000712

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:12Benign:2Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Bloom syndrome Uncertain:5
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsApr 02, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingSt. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research HospitalJul 11, 2023The BLM c.968A>G (p.Lys323Arg) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.07% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with Bloom syndrome. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024This sequence change replaces lysine, which is basic and polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 323 of the BLM protein (p.Lys323Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs146504061, gnomAD 0.07%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 23028338). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 127518). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BLM protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Oct 17, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
not provided Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 03, 2023In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in an individual with high grade serous ovarian carcinoma with a family history suggestive of Lynch syndrome, who also harbored pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and RAD51C (Infante et al., 2022); Observed in individuals with personal or family history including breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, neuroblastoma, mesothelioma, and Lynch syndrome-related cancers (Dalgliesh et al., 2010; Thompson et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2015; Martin-Morales et al., 2018; Bononi et al., 2020; Guindalini et al., 2022); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327, 23028338, 22829774, 28873162, 28944238, 20054297, 30256826, 26580448, 30171174, 33318203, 35264596, 33436027, 36232793, 35892882, 34117267, 33606809) -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BLM p.Lys323Arg variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs146504061), ClinVar (classified as VUS by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Mendelics, Fulgent Genetics and GeneDx for Bloom syndrome and Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome) and LOVD 3.0 (classified as a VUS) but was not identified in Cosmic. The variant was also found in control databases in 109 of 282184 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000386 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 96 of 128798 chromosomes (freq: 0.000745), Other in 3 of 7198 chromosomes (freq: 0.000417), African in 6 of 24952 chromosomes (freq: 0.000241) and Latino in 4 of 35350 chromosomes (freq: 0.000113), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish) and South Asian populations. This variant was identified in 1/681 healthy individuals in a study assessing variation in cancer genes in a healthy population (Bodian_2014_PMID 24728327). Another study identified the K323R variant in 1/453 cases of breast cancer (Thompson_2012_PMID 23028338). The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. The p.Lys323 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJul 31, 2023In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (PMID: 22829774 (2012)), breast cancer (PMID: 35264596 (2022), 23028338 (2012)), colon polyps (PMID: 33436027 (2021)), mesothelioma and/or melanoma (PMID: 33318203 (2020)), and neuroblastoma (PMID: 26580448 (2015)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0012 (61/50710 chromosomes in North-Western European subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is benign or damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
not specified Uncertain:2Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoNov 29, 2021DNA sequence analysis of the BLM gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.968A>G, in exon 5 that results in an amino acid change, p.Lys323Arg. This sequence change has been previously described in a family with breast cancer (PMID: 23028338). This sequence change has been described in the gnomAD database with a low population frequency of 0.075% in non-Finnish Europeans (dbSNP rs146504061). The p.Lys323Arg change affects a moderately conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the BLM protein that is not known to be functional. In-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL) provide contradictory results for the p.Lys323Arg substitution. Due to these contrasting evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Lys323Arg change remains unknown at this time. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJun 29, 2023Variant summary: BLM c.968A>G (p.Lys323Arg) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the RecQ-like DNA helicase BLM, N-terminal domain (IPR032437) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00037 in 252142 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in BLM causing Bloom Syndrome (0.00037 vs 0.0035), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.968A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with various cancers without strong evidence of causality, as well as in unaffected controls (e.g. Bodian_2014, Bononi_2020, Guindalini_2022, Infante_2022, Li_2021, Mondschein_82022, Patel_2021, Paulo_2018, Sandoval_2021, Zhang_2015, Martin-Morales_2018). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Bloom Syndrome. Co-occurrence with other pathogenic variants has been reported in an ovarian cancer patient (BRCA1 c.4165_4166del, p.Gln1388_Ser1389insTer; RAD51C c.709C>T, p.Arg237Ter; Infante_2022), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 33436027, 36232793, 26580448, 35264596, 24728327, 29659569, 35892882, 34117267, 33318203, 33606809, 30256826). 11 submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, and classified it as uncertain significance (n=10) or likely benign (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jan 04, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 28, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJan 23, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.081
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.34
Cadd
Benign
18
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.10
T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.41
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.40
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.94
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.60
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.071
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.12
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.81
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.3
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.92
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.2
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.11
Sift
Benign
0.33
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.37
T;T
Polyphen
0.99
D;.
Vest4
0.16
MVP
0.86
MPC
0.23
ClinPred
0.13
T
GERP RS
5.2
Varity_R
0.033
gMVP
0.11

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146504061; hg19: chr15-91298049; COSMIC: COSV104665696; COSMIC: COSV104665696; API