rs146588336

chr19-7132162-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP2 BP4_Strong BP6 BS1

The NM_000208.4(INSR):c.2838C>G(p.Asp946Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0024 in 1,614,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 (1 hom., cov: 31)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0025 (5 hom.)
• Consequence: INSR NM_000208.4 missense
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4 B:4
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.970

Genes affected

INSR (HGNC:6091): (insulin receptor) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that form a heterotetrameric receptor. Binding of insulin or other ligands to this receptor activates the insulin signaling pathway, which regulates glucose uptake and release, as well as the synthesis and storage of carbohydrates, lipids and protein. Mutations in this gene underlie the inherited severe insulin resistance syndromes including type A insulin resistance syndrome, Donohue syndrome and Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

• PP2: Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, INSR
• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01764226).
• BP6: Variant 19-7132162-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-7132162-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 211195.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=4}. Variant chr19-7132162-G-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0014 (213/152320) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00253 (172/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00222. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 86 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
INSR	NM_000208.4	c.2838C>G	p.Asp946Glu	missense_variant	14/22	ENST00000302850.10
INSR	NM_001079817.3	c.2802C>G	p.Asp934Glu	missense_variant	13/21
INSR	XM_011527988.3	c.2838C>G	p.Asp946Glu	missense_variant	14/22
INSR	XM_011527989.4	c.2802C>G	p.Asp934Glu	missense_variant	13/21

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
INSR	ENST00000302850.10	c.2838C>G	p.Asp946Glu	missense_variant	14/22	1	NM_000208.4	A2
INSR	ENST00000341500.9	c.2802C>G	p.Asp934Glu	missense_variant	13/21	1		P3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00140 AC: 213 AN: 152202 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000579

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00219

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000327

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.000848

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00253

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00133 AC: 335 AN: 251080 Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00129 AC XY: 175 AN XY: 135712

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000185

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000173

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.000370

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00273

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00130

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00251 AC: 3665 AN: 1461802 Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00242 AC XY: 1758 AN XY: 727188

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000358

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.000693

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00316

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00146

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00140 AC: 213 AN: 152320 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00115 AC XY: 86 AN XY: 74478

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000577

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000327

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.000848

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00253

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000473

Alfa AF: 0.00209 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00138

TwinsUK AF: 0.00270 AC: 10

ALSPAC AF: 0.00389 AC: 15

ESP6500AA AF: 0.000227 AC: 1

ESP6500EA AF: 0.00302 AC: 26

ExAC AF: 0.00122 AC: 148

Asia WGS AF: 0.000289 AC: 1 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.00207

EpiControl AF: 0.00213

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4 Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Dec 06, 2023	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Feb 11, 2016	- -

Insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus AND acanthosis nigricans Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Leprechaunism syndrome Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Jul 30, 2020

- -

Monogenic diabetes Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

research

Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine

Jul 31, 2015

ACMG Criteria: BS2, BP4 -

INSR-related disorder Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Apr 29, 2022

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.21
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.36	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.28
Cadd	Benign	18
Dann	Benign	0.29
Eigen	Benign	-0.64
Eigen_PC	Benign	-0.53
FATHMM_MKL	Uncertain	0.96	D
LIST_S2	Benign	0.80	T;T
M_CAP	Benign	0.013	T
MetaRNN	Benign	0.018	T;T
MetaSVM	Benign	-0.93	T
MutationTaster	Benign	1.0	D;D
PrimateAI	Benign	0.46	T
PROVEAN	Benign	-0.74	N;N
REVEL	Benign	0.14
Sift	Benign	0.99	T;T
Sift4G	Benign	1.0	T;T
Polyphen		0.0	B;B
Vest4		0.43
MutPred		0.29		.;Gain of catalytic residue at D946 (P = 0.1177);
MVP		0.78
MPC		0.74
ClinPred		0.0012	T
GERP RS		1.2
Varity_R		0.069
gMVP		0.72

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.020		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146588336; hg19: chr19-7132173;