rs146590697

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000334.4(SCN4A):ā€‹c.489C>Gā€‹(p.Thr163=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00902 in 1,576,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 144 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0090 ( 16 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0090 ( 128 hom. )

Consequence

SCN4A
NM_000334.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0970
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN4A (HGNC:10591): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 4) Voltage-gated sodium channels are transmembrane glycoprotein complexes composed of a large alpha subunit with 24 transmembrane domains and one or more regulatory beta subunits. They are responsible for the generation and propagation of action potentials in neurons and muscle. This gene encodes one member of the sodium channel alpha subunit gene family. It is expressed in skeletal muscle, and mutations in this gene have been linked to several myotonia and periodic paralysis disorders. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 17-63971844-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-63971844-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 255858.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-63971844-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.097 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (MID) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0541 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
SCN4ANM_000334.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.489C>G p.Thr163= synonymous_variant 4/24 ENST00000435607.3 NP_000325.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN4AENST00000435607.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.489C>G p.Thr163= synonymous_variant 4/241 NM_000334.4 ENSP00000396320 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00906
AC:
1139
AN:
125658
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00911
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0600
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0186
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00242
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0513
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0277
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00995
AC:
2432
AN:
244512
Hom.:
26
AF XY:
0.0109
AC XY:
1449
AN XY:
132874
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00126
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00602
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0515
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000114
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00257
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00939
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0162
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00902
AC:
13091
AN:
1451162
Hom.:
128
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00961
AC XY:
6937
AN XY:
721686
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00211
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00602
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0508
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000512
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0173
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00230
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00788
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0132
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00905
AC:
1138
AN:
125776
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00874
AC XY:
541
AN XY:
61896
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00247
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00910
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0600
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0186
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00242
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0273
Alfa
AF:
0.0129
Hom.:
9
Bravo
AF:
0.00762
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00433
AC:
15
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJul 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 04, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Familial hyperkalemic periodic paralysis Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hypokalemic periodic paralysis, type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Paramyotonia congenita of Von Eulenburg Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Potassium-aggravated myotonia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Congenital myasthenic syndrome 16 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
7.4
DANN
Benign
0.56

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146590697; hg19: chr17-62049204; API