Menu
GeneBe

rs146691765

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.369C>G(p.Thr123=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000369 in 1,614,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T123T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00036 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00037 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

NF1
NM_001042492.3 synonymous

Scores

6

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.148
Variant links:
Genes affected
NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006127566).
BP6
Variant 17-31163266-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31163266-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184262.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-31163266-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr17-31163266-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.148 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000369 (540/1461854) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0125 (498/39694). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0116. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 259 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 55 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
NF1NM_001042492.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.369C>G p.Thr123= synonymous_variant 4/58 ENST00000358273.9
NF1NM_000267.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.369C>G p.Thr123= synonymous_variant 4/57
NF1NM_001128147.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.369C>G p.Thr123= synonymous_variant 4/15

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
NF1ENST00000358273.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.369C>G p.Thr123= synonymous_variant 4/581 NM_001042492.3 P1P21359-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000361
AC:
55
AN:
152162
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00962
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000828
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000852
AC:
214
AN:
251314
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.000817
AC XY:
111
AN XY:
135834
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0111
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000816
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000369
AC:
540
AN:
1461854
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000356
AC XY:
259
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0125
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000431
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000361
AC:
55
AN:
152280
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000430
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00964
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000427
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000502
ExAC
AF:
0.000881
AC:
107
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00289
AC:
10
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenOct 26, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabMar 15, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 18, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 21, 2017Variant summary: The NF1 c.369C>G (p.Thr123Thr) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 107/121302 control chromosomes (2 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the East Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.012034 (104/8642). This frequency is about 58 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic NF1 variant (0.0002084), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of East Asian origin. The variant was reported in patients in the literature who also carry truncating NF1 mutations, further supporting the benign nature of the variant of interest. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as likely benign/benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Neurofibromatosis, type 1;C0349639:Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia;C0553586:Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis;C1834235:Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal;C2931482:Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsJan 07, 2022- -
Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 15, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
Cadd
Benign
8.0
Dann
Benign
0.62
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.52
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.41
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0061
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
GERP RS
-1.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146691765; hg19: chr17-29490284; COSMIC: COSV62214161; API