rs146752863

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_173477.5(USH1G):c.756C>T(p.Asp252Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000294 in 1,606,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00030 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

USH1G
NM_173477.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.203

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

USH1G (HGNC:16356): (USH1 protein network component sans) This gene encodes a protein that contains three ankyrin domains, a class I PDZ-binding motif and a sterile alpha motif. The encoded protein interacts with harmonin, which is associated with Usher syndrome type 1C. This protein plays a role in the development and maintenance of the auditory and visual systems and functions in the cohesion of hair bundles formed by inner ear sensory cells. Mutations in this gene are associated with Usher syndrome type 1G (USH1G). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

USH1G Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Usher syndrome type 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
Usher syndrome type 1G
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

USH1G links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).

BP6

Variant 17-74920080-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-74920080-G-A is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 228198.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.203 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein
USH1G	NM_173477.5 link	c.756C>T	p.Asp252Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 3	ENST00000614341.5	NP_775748.2
USH1G	NM_001282489.3 link	c.447C>T	p.Asp149Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 3		NP_001269418.1
USH1G	XM_011524296.2 link	c.447C>T	p.Asp149Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 3		XP_011522598.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein
USH1G	ENST00000614341.5 link	c.756C>T	p.Asp252Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 3	1	NM_173477.5	ENSP00000480279.1
USH1G	ENST00000579243.1 link	n.*355C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 3	2		ENSP00000462568.1
USH1G	ENST00000579243.1 link	n.*355C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 2 of 3	2		ENSP00000462568.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000197

AC:

AN:

152254

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000279

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000132

AC:

AN:

242494

AF XY:

0.000128

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000581

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000260

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000305

AC:

443

AN:

1453814

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000293

AC XY:

212

AN XY:

723496

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000598

AC:

AN:

33458

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000134

AC:

AN:

44678

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26106

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39666

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000232

AC:

AN:

86224

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

46200

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5760

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000368

AC:

409

AN:

1111430

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000381

AC:

AN:

60292

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.476

Heterozygous variant carriers

102

136

170

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

110

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000197

AC:

AN:

152372

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000215

AC XY:

AN XY:

74512

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000481

AC:

AN:

41592

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000522

AC:

AN:

15312

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000279

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.488

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000424

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000208

EpiCase

AF:

0.000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

May 20, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

USH1G: BP4, BP7 -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 06, 2019

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

May 07, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Asp252Asp in exon 2 of USH1G: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 17/64230 European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitut e.org; dbSNP rs146752863). -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

USH1G-related disorder

Benign:1

Oct 28, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.52

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.92

PhyloP100

0.20

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over