rs146902902
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_000310.4(PPT1):c.904A>G(p.Ile302Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00124 in 1,614,160 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I302M) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000310.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPT1 | NM_000310.4 | c.904A>G | p.Ile302Val | missense_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000642050.2 | |
PPT1 | NM_001363695.2 | c.832A>G | p.Ile278Val | missense_variant | 8/8 | ||
PPT1 | NM_001142604.2 | c.595A>G | p.Ile199Val | missense_variant | 6/6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPT1 | ENST00000642050.2 | c.904A>G | p.Ile302Val | missense_variant | 9/9 | NM_000310.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000861 AC: 131AN: 152194Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00115 AC: 290AN: 251412Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00118 AC XY: 161AN XY: 135866
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00128 AC: 1875AN: 1461848Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00130 AC XY: 946AN XY: 727224
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000860 AC: 131AN: 152312Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000994 AC XY: 74AN XY: 74464
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 1 Uncertain:3Benign:3Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Nov 17, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect, ClinGen | - | Variant interpretted as Uncertain significance and reported on 05/31/2018 by GTR ID 26957. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | May 23, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Nov 11, 2019 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:4Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 10, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 03, 2023 | Reported previously in the heterozygous state in a male individual with hypsarrhythmia, infantile spasms, and developmental delay who also harbored a de novo pathogenic variant in KCNQ2 and a variant in PCDH19 (Millichap et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27861786) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jul 13, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Oct 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2023 | PPT1: BS2 - |
Intellectual disability Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Centre de Biologie Pathologie Génétique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille | Jan 01, 2019 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 31, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
PPT1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 25, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at