rs146965678

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_017849.4(TMEM127):c.565C>T(p.Leu189Leu) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00039 in 1,614,178 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L189L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00039 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TMEM127
NM_017849.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.08

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TMEM127 (HGNC:26038): (transmembrane protein 127) This gene encodes a transmembrane protein with four predicted transmembrane domains. The protein is associated with a subpopulation of vesicular organelles corresponding to early endosomal structures, with the Golgi, and with lysosomes, and may participate in protein trafficking between these structures. Mutations in this gene and several other genes cause pheochromocytomas. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding the same protein have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2022]

TMEM127 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
pheochromocytoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
renal cell carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp

TMEM127 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).

BP6

Variant 2-96253960-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-96253960-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 184272.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000368 (56/152286) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000515 (35/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00038. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 28 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 56 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein
TMEM127	NM_017849.4 link	c.565C>T	p.Leu189Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 4	ENST00000258439.8	NP_060319.1
TMEM127	NM_001193304.3 link	c.565C>T	p.Leu189Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 4		NP_001180233.1
TMEM127	NM_001407282.1 link	c.313C>T	p.Leu105Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 3		NP_001394211.1
TMEM127	NM_001407283.1 link	c.313C>T	p.Leu105Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 3		NP_001394212.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TMEM127	ENST00000258439.8 link	c.565C>T	p.Leu189Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 4	1	NM_017849.4	ENSP00000258439.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000368

AC:

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000169

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000865

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00949

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000514

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000479

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000378

AC:

AN:

251446

AF XY:

0.000419

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000405

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00139

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000492

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000978

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000393

AC:

574

AN:

1461892

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000393

AC XY:

286

AN XY:

727248

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000508

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000291

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000918

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000464

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53418

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00364

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000403

AC:

448

AN:

1112012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000778

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.486

Heterozygous variant carriers

119

159

199

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000368

AC:

AN:

152286

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000376

AC XY:

AN XY:

74478

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000168

AC:

AN:

41558

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000458

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000865

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.0102

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000515

AC:

AN:

68022

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000474

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.482

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000540

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000344

EpiCase

AF:

0.000382

EpiControl

AF:

0.000889

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

TMEM127: BP4, BS1, BS2

not specified

Benign:3

Sep 14, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Mar 04, 2020

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 12, 2025

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Pheochromocytoma

Benign:3

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 07, 2022

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Nov 17, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

May 18, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma

Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.46

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.66

PhyloP100

5.1

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over