rs147036141
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP7BS2BP4BA1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.705A>G (p.Leu235=) variant in APC is a synonymous (silent) variant that is not predicted to impact splicing by multiple splicing predictors including SpliceAI, VarSEAK and MaxEntScan (BP4, BP7). This variant has been observed 3 (≥ 2) times in homozygous state in gnomAD 2.1.1 (BS2). The highest population minor allele frequency in the non-cancer population of gnomAD v2.1.1 is 0.004669 in the Finnish population, which is higher than the ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Variant Curation Expert Panel (HCCP VCEP) threshold (>0.001) for BA1, and therefore meets this criterion (BA1). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as Benign for FAP based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the HCCP VCEP: BA1, BS2, BP4, and BP7 (Specification Version 1.0; date of approval: 12/12/2022). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA012805/MONDO:0021056/089
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001354906.2 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | NM_000038.6 | c.705A>G | p.Leu235Leu | synonymous_variant | 7/16 | ENST00000257430.9 | NP_000029.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | ENST00000257430.9 | c.705A>G | p.Leu235Leu | synonymous_variant | 7/16 | 5 | NM_000038.6 | ENSP00000257430.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00211 AC: 322AN: 152248Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00228 AC: 573AN: 251210Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00219 AC XY: 298AN XY: 135764
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00318 AC: 4649AN: 1460340Hom.: 10 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00304 AC XY: 2209AN XY: 726514
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00211 AC: 322AN: 152366Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00184 AC XY: 137AN XY: 74524
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 20, 2012 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 27, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 14, 2022 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:7
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 13, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 09, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | APC: BP4, BP7 - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Oct 10, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Dec 20, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 24, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 17, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Aug 31, 2020 | - - |
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Variant Curation Expert Panel | Feb 18, 2023 | The c.705A>G (p.Leu235=) variant in APC is a synonymous (silent) variant that is not predicted to impact splicing by multiple splicing predictors including SpliceAI, VarSEAK and MaxEntScan (BP4, BP7). This variant has been observed 3 times in homozygous state in gnomAD 2.1.1 (BS2). The highest population minor allele frequency in the non-cancer population of gnomAD v2.1.1 is 0.004669 in the Finnish population, which is higher than the ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Variant Curation Expert Panel (HCCP VCEP) threshold (>0.001) for BA1, and therefore meets this criterion (BA1). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as Benign for FAP based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the HCCP VCEP: BA1, BS2, BP4, and BP7 (Specification Version 1.0; date of approval: 12/12/2022). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Feb 26, 2024 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Leu235Leu variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located near a splice junction. It has been reported in the UMD (x1) and LOVD (x2) databases. In addition, it is observed as a low frequency variant in the ESP cohort, increasing the likelihood this variant does not have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information, this variant is predicted benign. - |
APC-Associated Polyposis Disorders Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at