rs147070644

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate

The NM_194248.3(OTOF):c.5038C>T(p.Arg1680Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000634 in 1,613,580 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00041 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00066 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

OTOF
NM_194248.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.91

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OTOF links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.23864141).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOF	NM_194248.3 link	c.5038C>T	p.Arg1680Cys	missense_variant	Exon 40 of 47	ENST00000272371.7	NP_919224.1	Q9HC10-1
OTOF	NM_194323.3 link	c.2737C>T	p.Arg913Cys	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 29	ENST00000339598.8	NP_919304.1	Q9HC10-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
OTOF	ENST00000272371.7 link	c.5038C>T	p.Arg1680Cys	missense_variant	Exon 40 of 47	1	NM_194248.3	ENSP00000272371.2		Q9HC10-1
OTOF	ENST00000339598.8 link	c.2737C>T	p.Arg913Cys	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 29	1	NM_194323.3	ENSP00000344521.3		Q9HC10-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000407

AC:

AN:

152182

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000289

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000411

AC:

103

AN:

250712

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000354

AC XY:

AN XY:

135682

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000124

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000545

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000830

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000658

AC:

961

AN:

1461398

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000607

AC XY:

441

AN XY:

727008

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000149

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000894

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000830

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000315

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000407

AC:

AN:

152182

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000350

AC XY:

AN XY:

74332

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000289

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000735

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000541

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000370

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00162

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00156

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000454

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000930

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000502

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:2

Jun 30, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.Arg1680Cys variant in OTOF has now been identified by our laboratory in th e heterozygous state in 2 individuals with hearing loss, but a second variant af fecting the remaining copy of the gene has not been found in of either individua l. This variant has also been identified in 0.1% (60/65886) of European chromoso mes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; d bSNP rs147070644). Although this variant has been seen in the general populatio n, its frequency is not high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, the clinical significance of the p.Arg1680Cys variant is uncertain. -

Feb 17, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: OTOF c.5038C>T (p.Arg1680Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00041 in 250712 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in OTOF causing Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss And Deafness, Type 9 (0.00041 vs 0.0011), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.5038C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss, however without strong evidence for causality (e.g., Sloan-Heggen_2016). Additionally, one ClinVar submitter reports identifying the variant in at least two heterozygous individuals with hearing loss, however, no second OTOF variant was identified (Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine). These reports do not provide conclusions about association of the variant with Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss And Deafness, Type 9. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) have cited the variant, with three submitters classifying the variant as uncertain significance and one submitter classifying the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9

Uncertain:2

Nov 09, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jul 11, 2024

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Reported with OTOF variants (phase unknown) in a patient with hearing loss in published literature (PMID: 26969326); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26969326) -

Mar 20, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.093

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.27

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.18

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.52

.;.;.;D;.;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.27

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.26

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.92

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

0.99

D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.11

MetaRNN

Benign

0.24

T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.16

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.81

.;.;.;L;L;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.53

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-4.5

D;D;.;D;D;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.48

Sift

Uncertain

0.0080

D;D;.;D;D;.

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0040

D;D;.;D;D;.

Polyphen

0.72

P;P;.;P;.;P

Vest4

0.47

MVP

0.90

MPC

0.35

ClinPred

0.25

GERP RS

4.4

Varity_R

0.14

gMVP

0.60

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over