rs147090213

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_018139.3(DNAAF2):c.1851C>T(p.Asn617Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000632 in 1,613,060 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0034 ( 5 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

DNAAF2
NM_018139.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.718

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAAF2 (HGNC:20188): (dynein axonemal assembly factor 2) This gene encodes a highly conserved protein involved in the preassembly of dynein arm complexes which power cilia. These complexes are found in some cilia and are assembled in the cytoplasm prior to transport for cilia formation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

DNAAF2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).

BP6

Variant 14-49633299-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-49633299-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 261015.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.718 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00338 (514/152250) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0118 (492/41538). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.011. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 235 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAAF2	NM_018139.3 link	c.1851C>T	p.Asn617Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 3	ENST00000298292.13	NP_060609.2	Q9NVR5-1
DNAAF2	NM_001083908.2 link	c.1851C>T	p.Asn617Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 2		NP_001077377.1	Q9NVR5-2
DNAAF2	NM_001378453.1 link	c.-205+184C>T		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 1		NP_001365382.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DNAAF2	ENST00000298292.13 link	c.1851C>T	p.Asn617Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 3	1	NM_018139.3	ENSP00000298292.8		Q9NVR5-1
DNAAF2	ENST00000406043.3 link	c.1851C>T	p.Asn617Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 2	1		ENSP00000384862.3		Q9NVR5-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00338

AC:

514

AN:

152132

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0119

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000916

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000956

AC:

240

AN:

250936

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000737

AC XY:

100

AN XY:

135622

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0128

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000752

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000882

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000654

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000346

AC:

505

AN:

1460810

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000296

AC XY:

215

AN XY:

726508

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0126

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000783

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000450

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000646

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00338

AC:

514

AN:

152250

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00316

AC XY:

235

AN XY:

74446

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0118

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000915

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00284

Alfa

AF:

0.00169

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00391

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:2

Jun 18, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 10

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.68

CADD

Benign

5.7

DANN

Benign

0.80

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.0

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.19

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over