rs147116577
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2
The NM_013266.4(CTNNA3):c.457G>C(p.Ala153Pro) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000213 in 1,613,010 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/23 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_013266.4 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTNNA3 | NM_013266.4 | c.457G>C | p.Ala153Pro | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 4/18 | ENST00000433211.7 | NP_037398.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTNNA3 | ENST00000433211.7 | c.457G>C | p.Ala153Pro | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 4/18 | 1 | NM_013266.4 | ENSP00000389714.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000312 AC: 78AN: 249932Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000267 AC XY: 36AN XY: 135068
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000221 AC: 323AN: 1460844Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000211 AC XY: 153AN XY: 726706
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000135 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74338
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | CTNNA3: BP4 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | provider interpretation | Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford University | Jan 25, 2018 | p.Ala153Pro (c.457G>C) in Exon 4 of the CTNNA3 gene (NM_013266.3) Chromosome location 10:69299263 C / G Based on the information reviewed below, including the lack of case data and this variant's frequency in population databases, we classify it as a Variant of Uncertain Significance, Probably Benign. The CTNNA3 gene currently has no well-established disease association; however, there is preliminary evidence supporting a correlation with autosomal dominant arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) (MedGen UID: 816468). This variant has not previously been reported in the literature in association with disease, according to the Invitae report. This is a conservative amino acid change, resulting in the replacement of a nonpolar Alanine with a nonpolar Proline (that is more sterically constrained). Alanine at this location is poorly conserved across ~100 vertebrate species for which we have data. There are no Likely Pathogenic or Pathogenic variants currently listed in ClinVar within 10 amino acids to either side. According to the Invitae report, algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. This variant was reported in 81 individuals in the gnomAD database, which includes variant calls on ~140,000 individuals of European, African, Latino, South Asian, Ashkenazi, and East Asian descent. Specifically, the variant was observed in 73 non-Finnish Europeans (for the highest allele frequency: 0.06%), 4 Finns, 2 Latinos, and 2 “Otherâ€. Overall MAF 0.03%. Whiffin et al (2017) proposed that variants with frequency greater than 0.009% are unlikely to be pathogenic for ARVC. The phenotype of those individuals is not publicly available. The dataset is comprised of multiple cohorts, some of which were recruited from the general population, others were enriched for common cardiovascular disease. The curators made an effort to exclude individuals with severe pediatric diseases. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 03, 2023 | The c.457G>C (p.A153P) alteration is located in exon 4 (coding exon 3) of the CTNNA3 gene. This alteration results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 457, causing the alanine (A) at amino acid position 153 to be replaced by a proline (P). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 13 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 15, 2024 | This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 153 of the CTNNA3 protein (p.Ala153Pro). This variant is present in population databases (rs147116577, gnomAD 0.06%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CTNNA3-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 180310). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Primary familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Blueprint Genetics | Oct 14, 2014 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at