rs147120218

Positions:

• chr16-23629898-T-C
• chr16-23629898-T-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7

The NM_024675.4(PALB2):​c.2256A>G​(p.Gly752=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000317 in 1,614,196 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00016 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: PALB2 NM_024675.4 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.0330

Genes affected

PALB2 (HGNC:26144): (partner and localizer of BRCA2) This gene encodes a protein that may function in tumor suppression. This protein binds to and colocalizes with the breast cancer 2 early onset protein (BRCA2) in nuclear foci and likely permits the stable intranuclear localization and accumulation of BRCA2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
• BP6: Variant 16-23629898-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-23629898-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 126642.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-23629898-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.033 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PALB2	NM_024675.4	c.2256A>G	p.Gly752=	synonymous_variant	5/13	ENST00000261584.9	NP_078951.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PALB2	ENST00000261584.9	c.2256A>G	p.Gly752=	synonymous_variant	5/13	1	NM_024675.4	ENSP00000261584	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00181 AC: 276 AN: 152188 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00640

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000655

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000479

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000394 AC: 99 AN: 251488 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000331 AC XY: 45 AN XY: 135918

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00560

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000173

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000161 AC: 236 AN: 1461890 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000158 AC XY: 115 AN XY: 727246

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00615

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000179

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00000540

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000265

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00181 AC: 275 AN: 152306 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00169 AC XY: 126 AN XY: 74492

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00635

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000654

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000474

Alfa AF: 0.000883 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00204

Asia WGS AF: 0.000289 AC: 1 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:14

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Feb 12, 2014	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Aug 15, 2019	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital	Aug 15, 2023	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	Sep 27, 2017	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Oct 01, 2015	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.	Jul 12, 2017	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Jul 10, 2018	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Dec 28, 2020	- -

not provided Benign:3

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Jul 28, 2022	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute	-	- -

Familial cancer of breast Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Feb 01, 2024	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	curation	Leiden Open Variation Database	May 13, 2019	Curators: Marc Tischkowitz, Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitter to LOVD: Marc Tischkowitz. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.84
CADD	Benign	1.4
DANN	Benign	0.35

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147120218; hg19: chr16-23641219;