rs147149347
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 3P and 1B. PM1PP3BP6
The NM_005228.5(EGFR):c.2305G>A(p.Val769Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000223 in 1,614,058 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V769L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005228.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EGFR | NM_005228.5 | c.2305G>A | p.Val769Met | missense_variant | Exon 20 of 28 | ENST00000275493.7 | NP_005219.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EGFR | ENST00000275493.7 | c.2305G>A | p.Val769Met | missense_variant | Exon 20 of 28 | 1 | NM_005228.5 | ENSP00000275493.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 251102 AF XY: 0.0000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000239 AC: 35AN: 1461834Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000289 AC XY: 21AN XY: 727226 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74368 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
The p.V769M variant (also known as c.2305G>A), located in coding exon 20 of the EGFR gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 2305. The valine at codon 769 is replaced by methionine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration has been identified in multiple individuals diagnosed with lung cancer (Hellmann MD et al. JCO Precis Oncol, 2017 May;1:; Yang J et al. Front Oncol, 2021 Apr;11:647598). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. -
- -
Lung carcinoma Uncertain:1
- -
EGFR-related lung cancer Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 769 of the EGFR protein (p.Val769Met). This variant is present in population databases (rs147149347, gnomAD 0.02%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with lung cancer (PMID: 32913967). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 208821). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt EGFR protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. Experimental studies are conflicting or provide insufficient evidence to determine the effect of this variant on EGFR function (PMID: 32913967). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Lung cancer Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at